Laserfiche WebLink
i _ r <br /> The Grupe Company Page 3 <br /> January 21,2013 <br /> facility allowed by right would remain.This option would include two fast food restaurants totaling 6,000 <br /> sq. ft., a grocery store at 25,000 sq.ft and a general retail store at 96,125 sq. ft. The total trip generation <br /> for this option is 12,661 daily trips, 536 AM peak hour trips and 1,085 PM peak hour trips. All the <br /> increase in trips would be due to assumed retail uses development. This equates to approximately a 180 <br /> percent increase in trips as compared to the proposed travel stop project. <br /> Based upon this significant increase in trip generation this alternative would result in a significant <br /> deterioration in intersection LOS conditions as compared to the proposed project LOS conditions. <br /> Table 3 provides a summary of trips generation for this alternative. <br /> TABLE3 <br /> ALTERNATIVE 1 FULL SITE DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION <br /> e - - <br /> _ <br /> - <br /> IELRAiternativel 0.25 acres 16 2 2 <br /> Option 1:No Project - - - <br /> Option 1:Total Trips 0.25 acres 16 2 2 <br /> Change in Cps compared to proposed <br /> (4,516) (304) (379) <br /> travel stop project <br /> Percentage change in Cps compared to _100% -99% -99•� <br /> ;proposed travel stop project <br /> i <br /> Change in Lips compare to EIR <br /> Akernauve l 0 0 0 j <br /> 'Peramtagechange in trips compare to a o <br /> EZRAlternative 1 0% 0% 0%i <br /> Option 2:Retail use for 11.68 acres r 11.68 acres 12,661 536 1,0851 <br /> ;Option 2:Total Trips 11..68 acresl 12,661 536 1,085 <br /> j Change in trps compared to proposed <br /> !travel stop reject 8,129 230 704 <br /> Percentage change in trips compared to <br /> 179% 75% 185% <br /> i <br /> proposed travelsiopproject <br /> Change in trps rompared to EIR /2,644 534 J083 <br /> Alternative I , <br /> Percentage change in trps compared to 77100% 26716% 54154% <br /> EIRAhernative I <br /> 1)Optlon 2 assumes full development of the site with retail uses and does not assume the <br /> 0.25 acres of land use"allowed byright under CS-F aon/ng"would remain. <br /> ALTERNATIVE 2:REDUCED PROJECT SIZE <br /> Option J:Travel stop use for remainder of land <br /> Option 1 assumes the same land uses as considered in the EIR for the remainder of the land. Basically <br /> this option equates to the proposed project land uses (ie adding another half size travel stop) this would <br /> result in the same trip generation as the base condition. Therefore, all intersections under this option will <br /> operate with the same LOS condition as contained in the E1R <br /> EXHIBIT 2 <br />