Laserfiche WebLink
The project site is representative of leapfrog <br /> development as it is bounded to the north and east by <br /> property shown on the General Plan as General <br /> Agriculture and Open Space Resource Conservation <br /> and zoned General Agriculture. The property is adjacent <br /> to the California Aqueduct to the southwest. The <br /> proposal does not appear to meet this policy. <br /> Limited Industrial General Plan Policies <br /> Development and Locational Criteria (General Plan Volume I, p. IV-32) <br /> Limited Industrial areas shall: <br /> (C) be located on a Minor Arterial or higher classification roadway. <br /> The proposed project site is located on the west side of Tracy <br /> Boulevard. Tracy Boulevard is currently classified as a Major <br /> Collector roadway, which is a higher classification roadway than <br /> Minor Arterial. The proposal does appear to meet this policy. <br /> (D) be located in areas served by, or planned to be served by a wastewater <br /> treatment plant, a water system, and a drainage system, all of which shall <br /> be public, unless only one parcel is involved. A limited number of areas <br /> may be zoned for development on septic tanks. The uses in these areas <br /> shall not individually or collectively generate wastewater whose volume or <br /> quality require a sewage treatment plant. These areas shall: <br /> • not be served by or be expected to be served by a sewage treatment <br /> plant during the planning period; <br /> • not be located where they will make the extension of services more <br /> difficult in the future; <br /> • be located where soil conditions can safely absorb sewage in <br /> conformance with local health and water quality standards; and <br /> • require a septic nitrate locating feasibility study prior to development. <br /> This project is not located in an area served by, or planned to be <br /> served by a public wastewater treatment plant, a public water <br /> system, and a public terminal drainage system. <br /> Summary <br /> The proposed General Plan amendment appears to be inconsistent with <br /> numerous General Plan policies. <br />