My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002185
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-00-24
>
SU0002185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2019 8:43:18 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:58:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002185
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-00-24
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
10/23/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\UP-00-24\SU0002185\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Musco Olive Products Site Ins ction 2 U 2 November 2001 <br /> stormwater falling on the facility is not metered at all. Ben Hall was informed that adequate flow <br /> metering would be required at the facility. <br /> 5. Ben Hall stated that high and low strength wastewater are mixed in the cannery and the adjacent <br /> pitting machine/floatation tank/sorting table. He recognized the need to separate the flows but had <br /> no plan to accomplish the separation. <br /> 6. Ben Hall stated the Class II ponds can evaporate 12 Mgal of high strength wastewater per year. He <br /> did not have an estimate of how much high strength wastewater is generated per year. When <br /> Regional Board staff raised the suggestion that Musco needs additional Class II ponds, Ben Hall <br /> stated the warehouse was constructed over the location of the planned third evaporation pond and <br /> that there wasn't room for an additional Class II pond now. <br /> 7. Waste lye solutions,pit floatation brine, and the highest TDS rinse water are reportedly always <br /> discharged to the Class II ponds. Retort cooling water, wash waters (including weak lye <br /> solutions), acetic acid storage solutions, pitting machine wastewater, and cannery floor wastewater <br /> (despite high TDS concentration), are always sent to the land application system. It is apparent, <br /> based on the increasing DIS concentrations in the land application area wastewater, that <br /> inappropriate mixing of high strength wastewater with the low strength wastewater is occurring. <br /> Source control efforts have been lacking. <br /> 8. Lye is reclaimed in above ground stainless steel tanks located near the one million gallon storage <br /> pond. Adding sodium hydroxide to the tank to increase the concentration reclaims most lye. Ben <br /> Hall stated there is no need to use virgin or fresh lye on premium grade olives. When lye is <br /> determined to be too contaminated for further use, it is discharged to the Class II ponds. <br /> 9. After going through the mechanical pitter, the olives float through a brine solution. Olives that <br /> still have pits sink,pitted olives float. Considerable leakage occurs at the pitter and floatation <br /> tank. The pitter uses relatively fresh water; however, after coming out of the floatation tank the <br /> olives are coated with brine. Much of the brine is caught using pans installed under the conveyer <br /> belt that transports the pitted olives to the manual sorting table. The brine caught by the pans is <br /> presumably recycled into the floatation tank. <br /> 10. The boiler feed water is treated with an ion exchange column. The ion exchange column is <br /> regenerated in place; regeneration brine is discharged to the Class II ponds. <br /> 11. Ben Hall stated the footprint of the facility has been established but additional processing tanks <br /> (lye bath tanks) are available and may be installed. Wastewater flow may exceed the 850,000 gpd <br /> that was requested in the year 2000 Report of Waste Discharge. Ben Hall estimated 600,000 to <br /> 800,000 gpd of wastewater is presently generated. The expansion of the facility will result in <br /> wastewater flows of approximately 1,000,000 gpd. <br /> 12. Field No. 2 (the area where the proposed storage pond is planned)has not been irrigated all <br /> summer pending construction of the wastewater storage pond. The irrigation pipe has been moved <br /> to other areas. However, at this time it appears the storage pond will not be built prior to the <br /> winter rains. <br /> 13. Ben Hall stated that computer controls have been added to the upper application area irrigation <br /> system and that this has improved the application and greatly reduced the generation of tailwater. <br /> However, tailwater was observed flowing from the upper land application area onto Field No. 2, <br /> despite the upper application area not being irrigated for a few days and a lack of rainfall. <br /> GV'roja�tea\SitcsSMnuaVnepal10201,Coc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.