Laserfiche WebLink
Del Monte/Disco <br /> Page 2 <br /> This factor as well as dilution must be considered when <br /> evaluating contaminant levels . <br /> PHS/EHD has received recommendations from the Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board, State Water Resources Control Board, and <br /> Department of Health Services, Drinking Water Branch to request <br /> groundwater samples undergo analysis for methyl tert- butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) . MTBE was introduced into gasoline in the late 1970' s as <br /> an oxygenator. Groundwater samples are to be analyzed using EPA <br /> Method 8020 (602) with a one time only confirmation analysis <br /> using EPA Method 8260 (624) . Subsequent to this confirmation, <br /> MTBE can be identified and quantified during routine BTEX <br /> analysis . Please include MTBE in the quarterly groundwater <br /> sampling analysis . If MTBE is not detected after two rounds of <br /> groundwater sampling its, analysis may be discontinued. <br /> In order to reduce groundwater sampling costs for this site, <br /> PHS/EHD recommends that the perimeter wells MW-DIS-3 , MW-DIS-BS, <br /> MW-DIS-BD, MW-DIS-9, and MW-DIS-10, be sampled every 6 months <br /> instead of every three months . The resultant schedule would be <br /> as follows : the sampling of MW-DIS-1, MW-DIS-2, MW-DIS-3 , and MW- <br /> DIS-10 one quarter and the sampling of MW-DIS-1, MW-DIS-2, MW- <br /> DIS-8S, MW-DIS-BD, and MW-DIS-9 the next quarter. This rotation <br /> would continue until other changes are proposed. <br /> The following items were requested in the PHS/EHD letter dated <br /> October 2 , 1995 and have not been submitted; the amount of soil <br /> generated from November 1994 through February 1995, with an <br /> explanation as to how the drill cuttings were shown to be clean <br /> or contaminated; the amount of water generated during the pump <br /> tests; the disposition of the purge water from quarterly <br /> monitoring; the as built specifications for the vapor extraction <br /> system. These items should be submitted as an addendum to this <br /> report by April 1, 1996 . <br /> The PID reading for February 16, 1995 was 10, 000 ppmv not 6, 000 <br /> ppmv as shown on Table 3 , so the pounds of TPH(g) removed should <br /> be recalculated accordingly. Please include this information in <br /> the above requested addendum along with the mathematical formula <br /> used to calculate the pounds of hydrocarbon removed. <br /> Wells SVE-3 and SVE-4 were installed in December 1995 . These <br /> wells are screened from 55 feet below grade (fbg) to 75 fbg <br /> instead of 50 fbg to 70 fbg, as agreed to in your letter dated <br /> November 29, 1995 . Depth to groundwater measured on February 13 , <br /> 1996, was approximately 62 fbg, which leaves only 7 feet of <br /> screened interval in the vadose zone. PHS/EHD has been informed <br /> by Del Tech that these wells have been connected to the vapor <br /> extraction system. PHS/EHD recommends that further tests be <br /> conducted using these wells to determine the radius of influence <br /> of vapor extraction and air sparge wells . <br />