My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FRESNO
>
1405
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505137
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2020 2:30:47 PM
Creation date
1/15/2020 1:23:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0505137
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0006565
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON SOIL TREATMENT FAC
STREET_NUMBER
1405
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
FRESNO
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1405 S FRESNO AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mc Leon IIrasowski,Ogden Projects,0 .2- 22 November 1993 <br /> The 4 November 1993 monitoring submittal also contained a number of errors that should be <br /> corrected in future monitoring reports. Table 2.3 of the May 1993 monitoring data shows "ND" <br /> for petroleum hydrocarbons in the diesel range; this does not match the laboratory data sheet, <br /> which shows a detected concentration of 56 µg/1. Summary tables of monitoring data over time <br /> for each well show data below the laboratory quantitation limit as "ND" with "detection limits" <br /> for each analyte summarized at the bottom of the table. This gives the false impression that <br /> quantitation limits have been constant over time. In addition, the reported "detection limits" do <br /> not match the attached laboratory data sheets. <br /> All data should be reported in one of three ways: <br /> 1) Numerical concentrations for all data above laboratory quantitation limits; <br /> 2) `Trace" for data between detection and quantitation limits, with detection and quantitation <br /> limits reported for all such data); <br /> 3) "< [detection limit]" for all data below laboratory detection limits. <br /> Since many of the detected constituents have been found in concentrations close to laboratory <br /> quantitation limits,it is critical to report all future data in this manner to be able to readily <br /> ascertain compliance with the water quality protection standard(background conditions). <br /> For the above-stated reasons,I am unable to agree with your conclusion that continued post- <br /> closure ground water monitoring at the Stockton Soils Treatment Facility is unnecessary. Ogden <br /> must continue quarterly monitoring of the three ground water monitoring wells until such time as <br /> Chapter 15 standards for cessation of monitoring are met. Due to the erratic nature of monitoring <br /> report submittals under heretofore informal monitoring requirements, I will begin drafting a <br /> formal monitoring and reporting program for your facility for my Executive Officer's signature. <br /> If you have questions regarding this letter,please call me at (916) 255-3123. <br /> i0N B. MARSHACK,D. ENV. <br /> Senior Environmental Specialist <br /> Environmental/Technical Support Unit <br /> Land Discharge Section <br /> J91 <br /> cc: Permitting Section,California Integrated Waste Management Board, Sacramento <br /> Ed,Padilla,San Joaquin County Environmental Health Services, Stockton <br /> s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.