Laserfiche WebLink
pound bags of Portland cement. If we take the two 47-pound bags we get to the 94-pound sack equivalent (even at 46 <br /> we are at 92-pound sacks). If we double the 4-gallons for 1 sack to 8-gallons for 2 sacks we are at 94-pounds for 8 gallons <br /> of water which puts us perfectly in-line with the SJC Well Standards. So the grout ratio shouldn't be a concern. Nuel <br /> understood what I was stating by using the lighter weight sack which is why it was conditionally approved. <br /> Also, please take into consideration the other comments discussed in my original email now that the grout ratio has <br /> concern has been resovled. <br /> Cheers <br /> Tamera Rogers, GIT I AFS Project Manager I Tamera.Rogers@arcadis.com <br /> Arcadis I Arcadis U.S., Inc. <br /> 6296 San Ignacio Ave, Ste C & D San Jose CA 1 95119 1 USA <br /> T. +1 408 797 20131 M. +1 408 239 9616 <br /> Connect with us! www.arcadis.com I Linkedln I Twitter I Facebook <br /> 00 ARCA DIS = ' <br /> EXPLOREArcadis cgcT <br /> DOWNLOAD OUR MOBILE APP <br /> Be green,leave it on the screen. <br /> From: Michael Kith [EH] [mailto:mkith@sicehd.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 4:05 PM <br /> To: Rogers,Tamera <Tamera.Rogers@arcadis.com>; Granborg,Jennifer<Jennifer.Granborg@arcadis.com> <br /> Subject: RE: Well Destruction Permits (Site and Right of Way) - 351515 4707 Pacific Avenue, Stockton -Additional items <br /> requested by County <br /> No, the grout ratio is required for all grouts. It is listed in-San Joaquin County Well Standard, 13.12.5. It is not just for <br /> pressure grout. All grout must meet that standard. <br /> Michael <br /> From: Rogers, Tamera [mailto:Tamera.RogersCai)arcadis.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 3:46 PM <br /> To: Michael Kith [EH]; Granborg, Jennifer <br /> Subject: RE: Well Destruction Permits (Site and Right of Way) - 351515 4707 Pacific Avenue, Stockton - Additional items <br /> requested by County <br /> Hi Michael, <br /> I am the Arcadis Project Manager for this site and have been following the correspondence between you and Jennifer <br /> Granborg. It seems there are many questions that have come up and I feel that we have provided you with everything <br /> necessary to provide the permits. Half of the wells at this site are already destroyed. Over drilling of the sparge wells was <br /> proven to be an insufficient manner of destruction as the wells are too small diameter to use a stinger as a guide rod to <br /> reach total depth of the well and ensure the entire well is destroyed to installed depth. <br /> The vapor well that remains onsite has a H&S concern due to a subsurface utility in close proximity to the well. Arcadis <br /> and Chevron would like to avoid the potential outfall of a utility strike. The monitoring well at the bus stop is proposed <br /> for pressure grouting to save unduly inconveniencing bus drivers and community members by dragging out the well <br /> destruction process. If pressure grouting is not a preferred option at this location, blast perforation plans were provided <br /> 3 <br />