My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0013078
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARBOR
>
1805
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508461
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0013078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2020 5:29:56 PM
Creation date
1/29/2020 3:44:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0013078
RECORD_ID
PR0508461
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0008092
FACILITY_NAME
CONTINENTAL GRAIN CO
STREET_NUMBER
1805
STREET_NAME
HARBOR
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14502005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1805 HARBOR ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 June 2009 <br /> AGE-NC Project No.05-1306 <br /> t». <br /> Page 20 of 33 <br /> 6.2. MANN-WHITNEY U TEST <br /> The Mann-Whitney U Testis equivalent to the Wilcoxon Rank sum test and is applicable to data that <br /> may or may not exhibit seasonal behavior and is a non-parametric test for assessing whether two <br /> samples of observations come from the same distribution.The null hypothesis in the Mann-Whitney <br /> test is that the two samples are drawn from a single population, and therefore that their probability <br /> distributions are equal. It requires the two samples to be independent, and the observations to be <br /> ordinal or continuous measurements.The test involves the calculation of a statistic,called U,whose <br /> distribution under the null hypothesis is known. <br /> The test requires eight consecutive rounds of quarterly or semi-annual sampling results and for the <br /> purpose of the Mann-Whitney U Test,all non-detect values are assigned a data value of zero(0).The <br /> data are onto a spreadsheet in the order the data was collected. A rank is assigned to each sample <br /> value,with the smallest value ranked#1 and the largest ranked#8. Sum the ranks for the data in the <br /> first year. Denote this sum as Wrs (Wilcoxon rank sum) and calculate the U statistic where U=26 <br /> Wrs. To interpret the U statistic for 2 groups of 4 samples,at U<3,the probability that year 2 data <br /> show a decrease relative to year 1 is at least 90 percent,and so,U<3 will be acceptable to show that <br /> } contaminant concentration is declining.If there are ties in the sample data,an average rank value for <br /> +— %aw the tied data is calculated and this average rank is assigned to the tied sample data. The level of <br /> confidence(a)is calculated(probability and the U statistic)for values of U calculated for two groups <br /> of four samples each. <br /> ti.. <br /> The spreadsheet utilized allows for interpretation of increasing or decreasing trends.At a 90 percent <br /> confidence level, a U statistic of three (3) or less indicates a decreasing trend and a U statistic of <br /> `. thirteen(13) or more indicates an increasing trend. If the data does not pass either the increasing or <br /> decreasing trend test, the "no trend" result will be displayed. <br /> Additional information regarding the Mann-WhitneyU Test assumptions andprocedures is included <br /> in Appendix J. In order to utilize a program that was designed to analyze data sets from LUST sites <br /> that has formulas locked and not open to manipulation,the Mann-Whitney U Statistical Test Form <br /> 4400-216 (212001) from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Remediation and <br /> Redevelopment Program was utilized. <br /> 6.2.1. Mann-Whitney U Test Data and Assumptions <br /> Data were assembled to include one or more contaminated monitoring wells near the down gradient <br /> plume margin, monitoring wells near the source zone, and monitoring wells along the flow line <br /> L. between the source and the down gradient plume margin well(s). Data were analyzed in groups of <br /> eight rounds per data set covering two years of quarterly sampling events. Therefore, wells with <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br /> v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.