My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
2025
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505804
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 5:47:42 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 4:02:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0505804
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007013
FACILITY_NAME
KOPPEL STOCKTON TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
2025
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2025 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION 2 <br /> Former Bagging Plant Interim Remedial Action <br /> This section describes the rationale and field activities planned for the interim remedial action in the former <br /> bagging plant area.The proposed soil amendment and replanting area (also called the treatment area),which is <br /> approximately 3/4 of an acre in size and is restricted to the eastern portion of the former bagging plant area,is <br /> shown on Figure 2.The proposed treatment depth for slip plowing and soil amendment application is 6 feet. <br /> 2.1 Amendment Selection <br /> Amendments to enhance conditions for phytoremediation or create conditions conducive to denitrification were <br /> evaluated.Three primary amendments were considered: lime,gypsum, and a source of organic carbon.These <br /> amendments are discussed in the following subsections. <br /> 2.1.1 Lime <br /> Amending the soil with lime will raise soil pH and create conditions more conducive to phytoremediatwn <br /> However, over-applying lime could create additional problems,such as reducing the availability of same nutrientts, <br /> including magnesium, phosphorus,and micronutrient metals. <br /> Soil samples collected from trenches excavated in the western part of the former bagging plant area v 2012 <br /> (Figure 2)were analyzed for both pH and buffer pH. Buffer pH is a laboratory test performed to detwmm~"w <br /> mass of lime required to change soil pH.The average buffer pH was 5.6, based on the results for 12 a«a awwiaa <br /> Soil with a buffer pH of 5.6 requires approximately 4.6 tons of calcium carbonate(that is,calcitic lire w» atin aor <br /> every 6 inches of soil depth to achieve a target pH of 6(Hart, 1998).At a rate of approximately 55 tar am acm of <br /> calcitic lime for a 6-foot treatment depth,approximately 41 tons of calcitic lime would be needed for *rw w ac+w <br /> treatment area.This rate of lime application would require excellent mixing of the entire soil volun w awwo a <br /> impractical when considering the treatment depth (6 feet). <br /> Soil samples from the treatment area (eastern portion of former bagging plant area)were analyzed 4x am but <br /> not buffer pH.The pH values of soil samples collected within the treatment area were somewhat hip. m n me <br /> pH in soil samples collected from the western part of the former bagging plant area,where the sarrowt kv t <br /> pH were collected.The range of pH and average pH of soil samples collected from the western part co me tormer <br /> bagging plant were 3.19 to 6.61 and 4.54, respectively. However,the range of pH and average pH of ww"r"Pirs <br /> collected in the treatment area were 3.75 to 7.85 and 6.00, respectively. In general, soil is less acidic "* <br /> treatment area than in the western part of the former bagging plant area, and less pH adjustment is expected to <br /> be needed. <br /> Although there is uncertainty about the buffer pH of the treatment area,the rate of lime application requred in <br /> the treatment area, and the ability to evenly mix lime into soil in the treatment area, application of lane to the <br /> treatment area is expected to enhance conditions for phytoremediation in the treatment area.Consequently,a <br /> modest amount of calcitic lime (approximately 5 tons per acre,or 3.75 tons for the treatment area)wi8 be applied <br /> for the interim remedial action. <br /> 2.1.2 Gypsum <br /> Amending the soil with gypsum is expected to directly help reduce aluminum toxicity.The results presented in the <br /> 2012 Annual Report(CH2M HILL, 2012)suggest that aluminum toxicity is a problem in the former bagging plant <br /> area. Unlike lime (calcite),gypsum does not have a significant effect on soil pH.As gypsum dissolves in the soil, <br /> calcium is expected to improve base saturation,in which calcium replaces aluminum and hydrogen on the soil <br /> exchange sites. Gypsum also helps with soil aggregation;the calcium in gypsum promotes flocculation of clays, <br /> which in turn leads to aggregation.A clay layer was observed during the 2012 investigation that appeared to be <br /> restricting root growth,and soil aggregation,in addition to breaking up the clay layer by slip plowing, could help <br /> mitigate the effects of the clay layer on root growth. Because gypsum is approximately 200 times more soluble <br /> RDD/131490001 (D H5152.DMX) 1 <br /> ES052913233837 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.