My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
2025
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505804
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 5:47:42 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 4:02:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0505804
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007013
FACILITY_NAME
KOPPEL STOCKTON TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
2025
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2025 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION 2 FORMER HOGGING PLANT INTERIM REMEDIAL ACTION <br /> than calcitic lime, calcium from gypsum penetrates soil farther than calcitic lime, minimizing the impacts of <br /> incomplete mixing of amendments into soil.Additionally,gypsum is a sulfate source.Sulfate can form a chemical <br /> complex with excess soluble aluminum,which is less toxic to plants than the uncomplexed aluminum ion.Over- <br /> application of gypsum is not expected to negatively affect tree growth. <br /> Common initial application rates for gypsum range from 2 to 4.5 tons per acre. Because of the anticipated positive <br /> effects of using gypsum as an amendment and the relatively low impact of over-application,a rate of 4 tons per <br /> acre,or 3 tons for the treatment area,will be used. <br /> 2.1.3 Carbon Source <br /> Adding a source of organic carbon,such as compost or mulch,could promote denitrification and modify the soil <br /> structure. In 1998,a pilot test using sugar and anola meal pellets as carbon sources was performed at the site to <br /> test in situ soil denitrification (CH2M HILL, 1998).The results of the pilot test were considered in the Feasibility <br /> Study Report(CH2M HILL, 2000b), in which it was concluded that there would be challenges for effective <br /> implementation of in situ denitrification.The challenges and the rationale for not selecting in situ denitrification <br /> as the soil remedy for the site included dd%n*y m maintaining saturated conditions.Saturated conditions are <br /> required to create conditions conducive to in situ denitrification. <br /> For this interim remedial action,the bent of amending the soil with organic carbon would be relatively minor. <br /> Therefore,the treatment area soil will not be awrndcd with organic carbon. <br /> 2.2 Field Procedures <br /> The treatment area is shown on Figure erim remedial action,existing trees and stumps in the <br /> treatment area will be removed,arnem. - oplied to the surface,the treatment area will be slip <br /> plowed and then graded, and new trees "Orr w,_ , The purpose of this approach is to amend and break up <br /> the soil to create conditions more condw.,%w 9v ve -mediation.The following subsections describe the details <br /> of implementing this interim remedial wal <br /> 2.2.1 Utility Clearance and Awn <br /> Underground Service Alert will be notifid at bast 4 burs before intrusive activities begin to mark subsurface <br /> utilities in the treatment area. In additWw a pnoaM utraty locator will perform utility locating in the treatment <br /> area. <br /> No permits are required for the soil amealawat and trete replanting described in this work plan. <br /> 2.2.2 Clearing and Grubbing <br /> All trees and stumps in the treatment area wA be removed so that the area is nearly free of obstructions to soil <br /> amendment and slip plowing(other than 1Monnonng well KP-3 and any utilities).Additional trees outside the <br /> treatment area might also need to be removed for epuipment to access the treatment area.The number of trees <br /> removed for equipment access will be mhnxnced to the extent practicable. <br /> 2.2.3 Slip Plowing <br /> Calcitic lime and gypsum will be applied to the ground surface at rates of 5 tons per acre and 4 tons per acre, <br /> respectively, as discussed in Section 2.1.After lime and gypsum have been spread on the ground surface, <br /> the treatment area will be slip plowed to a depth of approximately 6 feet bgs to break up the soil(including the <br /> clay layer observed during the 2012 investigation)and incorporate the amendments into the soil.Slip plowing is <br /> commonly used in the agriculture industry to break up deep soil layers that limit rooting or water movement.Slip <br /> plowing will be performed in two directions(north-south and east-west), and rows will be spaced approximately <br /> 2 feet apart.A small area around the perimeter of the treatment area will not be slip plowed to 6 feet bgs <br /> because of the operating constraints of the slip plow; a small amount of space is needed at the beginning of each <br /> row for the slip plow to advance to operating depth. <br /> Monitoring Well KP-3,which is in the treatment area,will be marked with traffic cones,or an equivalent marker, <br /> to minimize the potential for damage during slip plowing. If Monitoring Well KP-3 is damaged during <br /> 2-2 RDD/131490001(CAH5152.DOCX) <br /> E5052913233837 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.