Laserfiche WebLink
' C,eologcc al7`ecknus!n . Page 7 <br /> Initial Site Conceptual Model <br /> Project No. 1030.2 <br /> June 18, 2003 <br /> The test results showed the following: <br /> 1. MW-1 has a high level of alkalinity compared to MW-2 and MW-3. Elevated levels of <br /> alkalinity are an indicator of benzene biodegradation, either aerobic or anaerobic. <br /> 2. The average nitrate as nitrogen constituent in MW-2, 3 and 4 is 15.7 mg/L. MW-1 has <br /> 12-mg/L indicating nitrate depletion, which is consistent with biodegradation in an <br /> ' anaerobic environment. <br /> 3. Redox potential has been consistently lowest in MW-1 suggesting MW-1 is near the <br /> ' center of the plume (Table 5). <br /> o Redox potential measured over three years suggest the site conditions are in an <br /> anaerobic state. <br /> ' u Redox potential measurements from the last two quarters suggest that there is a <br /> reaction halo near MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4. <br /> 4. The groundwater temperature at the site ranges between 65° and 75°F. <br /> ' 5. The measured pH in the water table wells range between 7.3 and 7.6. <br /> The test results showed the following trends when comparing the contaminated zone to <br /> background conditions. <br /> 1. Alkalinity of the contaminated zone was enriched compared to background. This may <br /> be secondary evidence of aerobic biodegradation activity. <br /> 2. Nitrate of the contaminated zone was depleted compared to background. <br /> 3. Sulfate and total iron was inconclusive. <br /> 4. Oxidation-reduction potential of the contaminated zone is lower compared to <br /> background. <br /> 5. The measured pH in the water table wells range between 7.3 and 7.6. This pH range is <br /> ' conducive to maintaining aerobic biodegradation activity. <br /> 6. Temperature was slightly elevated in the impacted area. <br /> 4.6 Contaminant Mass Estimate Calculations <br /> Figure 4 shows a contour map of TPH-G soil contamination as interpreted by soil collected <br /> ' during various drilling events. The contamination appears to cover an area of <br /> approximately 3.000 W. Figure 5 is a cross section showing the estimated boundaries of <br /> TPH-G contamination, in the subsurface, used to calculate the mass of contamination in the <br /> ' soil. Figure 6 is a contour map of TPH-G groundwater contamination as interpreted by <br /> analytical data from quarterly groundwater monitoring events. <br /> The preliminary mass balance calculation, quantifying the amount TPH-G remaining at the -- <br /> site, is included as Table 6. Approximately 550 gallons of gasoline remain in the soil and <br /> ' approximately 2 gallons remain in groundwater at the site. <br /> 1 <br />