Laserfiche WebLink
Geological rechnccs Inc Page 4 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> 10 Project Na 662 2 <br /> September 24,2003 <br /> 1 • MW-3 contained the gasoline oxygenate MTBE at 2300Fig/l The well also contained <br /> gasoline oxygenates ETBE and TAME at 6 0 and 16 ug/l, respectively <br /> • The detections of ETBE and TAME in wells MW-1 and MW-3 are intermittent and <br /> appear to be dependent on elevated MTBE concentrations and associated elevated <br /> ' reporting limits <br /> • Deep screened well MW-104 contained 3 3 ug/1 MTBE This is the fifth consecutive <br /> event in which this well has tested positive for MTBE <br /> ' • Figure 4 MTBE vs Groundwater Elevation -- MW-3 illustrates a fairly direct <br /> relationship between the concentration of MTBE in groundwater and the elevation of <br /> groundwater in well MW-3 A linear trend line has been added to the figure to show a <br /> ' general decline in both groundwater elevation and MTBE concentrations over time <br /> • Neither BTEX nor TPH-G were present in any of the groundwater samples above the <br /> laboratory reporting limits <br /> ' • Table 3 includes Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) measurements for the site's <br /> wells Two of the wells had positive values and two had slightly negative values This <br /> ' suggests that there is a limited amount of biodegradation of the contaminant plume <br /> occurring This is to be expected, since the primary contaminant is MTBE, which is <br /> resistant to biodegradation But the wells with negative values, MW-2 and MW-104, <br /> have the lowest contaminant concentrations and this is an anomalous situation One <br /> would expect these wells to have higher (ORP) values since they are up gradient and <br /> below the contaminant plume, respectively <br /> GTI makes the following conclusions <br /> • The lateral extent of the groundwater contamination plume is only defined upgradient to <br /> ' the northwest by MW-2 <br /> • The vertical extent has not been defined since well MW-104 continues to exhibit low <br /> concentrations of MTBE However, it is believed to be near the bottom of the <br /> contaminant plume <br /> ' GTI makes the following recommendations <br /> Perform plume definition and evaluate the mass of contaminants present by installing <br /> additional monitoring wells GTI has submitted to the SJC PHS/EHD a "Soil & <br /> 1 Groundwater Investigation Work Plan" dated October 8, 2001 The work plan was <br /> approved with conditions in the SJC PHS/EHD's October 26, 2001 correspondence <br /> The first phase of the work, advancing a continuous core boring to determine site <br /> lithology, was completed on May 30, 2002 A monitoring well (MW-104) was placed <br /> in this boring with a five foot screened interval starting at 24 feet below the water table <br /> Since well MW-104 was installed, SJC/EHD staffing has changed In their November <br /> t18, 2002 letter correspondence, SJC/EHD has rescinded previously submitted work <br /> plans and have called for phased approach to continue the site investigation The <br /> phased approached consists of cone penetrometer testing (CPT), followed by <br /> 1 <br />