Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br /> and three (1) soil samples were taken: one at 14 bgl from the <br /> north end of the former tank site, one at 14 ' bq1 from the south <br /> end, and the 1rd one at b bgl from the east side, adjacent to <br /> the BJJ Co. property line. A composite sample was also taken <br /> from the removed spoil pale, which was temporazly stared on the <br /> northwest side of the oxcavataon. The samples from the north <br /> side (HC-IN, ) and the south side (HC-2S, ) were analyzed for 8TEY , <br /> TFH--G, TFH--D, total lead , and priority polutants. The sample <br /> from the east side (HC--3E, ) was analvaed only for TEM. The <br /> c_ompasi to sample from the spoil pile was -tesred for PTEA{ , TR=H---E, <br /> TFPH, and total lead. <br /> Laboratory results revealed that BTEX & volatile organics were <br /> below detection limits in all samples, but TFH--G, TPH--D,, motor <br /> oil , and total lead were present in most of the samples, refer ro <br /> Plate VI. The removed spoil was returned to the hole pending <br /> +urther word:. Exhibit E includes copse o of County EHD field <br /> notes during the investigative work , and Exhibit G contains <br /> copies of the lab results. <br /> On November 1P, 1991 , Geological Audit Services, Inc _ submitted a <br /> workplan to the County EHD for excavation I removal of the <br /> contaminated soil from the site; (refer to Exhibit F. ) That <br /> workplan was not implemented, and no word; has been done on the <br /> site since October of 1991 . <br /> In June, 1992, Wm. J. Hunter & Associates were retained by Husky <br /> Crane to revxeo I analyze the prior work , and prepare a workplan <br /> for delineating the vertical & lateral e- tent of the contamina- <br /> tion encountered during the work in October, 1991 . The site of <br /> the removed UST s is immediately adjacent to the Flush y Crane--BJJ <br /> Co. property line as shown on Plate VI. 05 mentioned Parker, an <br /> observation well has recently been placed can BJJ property to <br /> monitor possible groundwater contamination caused by a 7500 <br /> gallon fuel tank which as located beneath a building and could <br /> not be removed. Soil bars ngs beneath that tank- showed signifi- <br /> cant <br /> agnzfr-- <br /> cant levels of contaminants, and a water sample taken from the <br /> monitoring well in December 1991 revealed 25 ppb gasoline. <br /> Laboratory analyses of water samples taken from that well in 1994 <br /> were below detection limits, indicating that the hydraulic gra- <br /> dient may be to the west-southwest at that location. For that <br /> reason, an additional monitoring well has been permstteo on the <br /> property southwest of the buried tank to � ersfy that belief . <br /> besides the existing UST, there were two (2) above-ground gaso- <br /> line tanks on the 8JJ site about Std feet northeasterly from the <br /> location cif the removed tanks on the Husky Crane property. Those <br /> tanks were recently removed and replaced with UST s in the same <br /> 4 <br />