Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> First Quarter 1994 Status Report March 31, 1994 <br /> Golden Grain Company, Manteca Bean Facility, 229 Moffat Blvd , Manteca, CA 5 <br /> On February 17, 1994, samples were collected from the groundwater treatment system and analyzed <br /> for TPH-G, BTEX, total lead, organic lead, and ethylene dibromide at a state-certified laboratory <br /> Laboratory analysis reports and corresponding chain-of-custody records for the sampling event on <br /> February 17, 1994, are included in Attachment 4 Results of system historical analyses are <br /> summarized in Table 4 Laboratory results indicate that all effluent water constituents analyzed for <br /> were below the detection limit Analytical results of the effluent water sample were below the City of <br /> Manteca Public Works Department Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit (Permit No 92-2) limits <br /> On December 10, 1993, and February 11, 1994, the air stripper was dismantled and cleaned for <br /> routine maintenance On March 3, 1994, the air stripper was dismantled for inspection prior to <br /> installing the catalytic water conditioner (in order to monitor the water conditioner's performance) <br /> There was no discharge of system water during these maintenance events A total of 381,046 <br /> gallons of groundwater water were treated between December 2, 1993 and March 3, 1994�7�► 5,u7 <br /> (0", <br /> VAPOR EXTRACTION MONITORINGD 13 <br /> On February 17 and 23, 1994, vapor extraction monitoring was conducted to evaluate the <br /> subsurface effects of the vapor extraction system (VES) and quantify the static vapor concentrations <br /> of TPH-G in the sods located within the VES treatment area On February 17, 1994, air samples <br /> were collected for analysis from the VES influent, the effluent of the lead scrubber, and the effluent of <br /> the catalytic scavenger unit The samples were analyzed for BTEX, TPH-G, and total lead Results <br /> of laboratory analyses are shown in Table 5 Laboratory results indicate that effluent concentrations <br /> for all compounds or analytes that were analyzed for were below detection limits These effluent <br /> analysis results were below the 100 ppmv TPH-G limits set by the Unified Air Pollution Control <br /> District's permit to operate <br /> Before the vapor extraction system was sampled, the applied vacuum was measured at the two <br /> vapor extraction wells and the induced vacuum was measured at the monitoring wells within the VES <br /> treatment area (Tables 6 and 7) Readings were taken using a magnahelic gauge measured in <br /> inches of water vacuum Readings were recorded to determine extraction well efficiency and the <br /> influence of the vapor extraction wells on the surrounding soil Results of field data collected this <br /> quarter correspond with the expected vacuum effect for the surrounding area The vapor extraction <br /> pilot study performed in 1990 determined a radius of influence ranging from 55 feet to 90 feet <br /> depending on the air flow rate being pulled from the test extraction well The readings collected on <br /> February 17, 1994, showed influence 70 feet away from well MW-2 at a flow rate of approximately 88 <br /> cubic feet per minute (cfm) This corresponds with the expected radius of influence determined <br /> from the original vapor extraction system pilot study <br /> • 5510R014 020 <br /> GROUNDWATER <br /> HEITECHNOLOGY,INC <br />