Laserfiche WebLink
Section No 10 <br /> Revision No ' 0 . <br /> Date` , September 5, 1991 <br /> y Page 3 ,of 10 <br /> reviewing' the ' results, for reasonableness +r in' ,conjunction with <br /> icwiedge UL J7UML. LLIULLLLULLUr, U&LLd ,alio LLJYLL1W6GW1Wr, { --- <br /> no <br /> _ for evidence',of significant deviations from established"" trends, <br /> f ' 11 ' I <br /> documenting his review in the project file <br /> is If daia-val'idation,procedures., suggest a problem exists, 'the review <br /> individual shall• <br /> I , , <br /> --�--notify-the ,Project-Manager-of the-questionable-data, <br /> review the -fields records for evidence.,that the data anomolies <br /> arerrelated+ to sampling technique/error, <br /> , 1 I } I , ! t = <br /> If as _review of. the filed sampling procedures does not resolve the <br /> question associated with the laboratory data the Project Manager or <br /> his appointed designee shall contact the laboratry, QA/QC <br /> x . � <br /> representative a_ndichallange the' suspect data,- <br /> ■ After careful, review, the laboratory QA/QC representative shall <br />' either Verify,11 discount 'or modify the reported data; and issue a <br /> + ' revised report as required • <br /> j Y <br /> I , <br /> 10 1 _4 Cornptlter Processed Data <br /> Data validation and reporting procedures for computer-processed data <br /> will be performed in accordance with the following,protocols <br /> ■ The project manager 'shall assign a project or senior level team <br /> member the responsibility for validating or ,reporting computer- <br /> processed data,, <br /> r I , <br /> } <br /> ■ The assigned individual shall validate all computer-processed data , <br /> b <br /> , � I <br /> reviewing the computer software specificationsand validation <br /> test results <br /> I , <br /> I <br /> reviewing the computer input data for reasonableness , <br /> reviewing , the computer output data for reasonableness and <br /> consisting with observations made in the field, and <br /> performing "spot check" hand calculations and comparing to <br /> computer generated results <br /> 10-3 <br />