SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

CHRONOLOGY -8- September 1988, and there is no evidence of hydrocarbon contam- ination onsite. 03-21-89 San Joaquin County Grand Jury (1988-1989) investigation on the PS gasoline leak finds Time Oil responsible for the 8 February 1988 spill onsite, costs to the fire department and SJLHD must be recovered, RB effectiveness is curtailed by inadequacy of staff and high turnover in personnel, and the DA does not re- ceive full cooperation from RB staff. 03-31-89 SUP letter transmits 1985 pressure tests data; a report on chromatograms interpretation indicating contamination from gasousedlbyeSFPP)Seandaadreportres fromut no TracerP-4 fuel Research(only produt indicatingcno leaks in SUP pipelines. All information was submitted in conjunction with SFPP's request to be taken out of C&A. 04-07-89 ST letter to SJLHD regarding removal of a 10,000-gallon under- ground tank (Tank 2) and a 4,000-gallon tank (Tank 4). Tank 2 will be replaced with a 10,000-gallon aboveground tank and Tank 4 with a 6,000-gallon fiberglass underground tank. 04-14-89 Attendance sheet of staff meeting with SJLHD and PS and its tenants. 04-19-89 Staff memo discusses meeting of 04-14-89 and summarizes com- ments on all reports submitted by PS and its tenants to date. 05-03-89 SUP transmits "Groundwater Investigation and Environmental Assessment, Stockton Terminal, Stockton California, April 28, 1989. " 05-03-89 TC letter says work plan discussed at 04-14-89 meeting will be submitted 08-01-89 and include first two actions specified in the draft C&A: (1) Feasibility study (FS) for interim fuel product recovery; and (2) Plan for complete definition of on- and off-site contamination. 05-03-89 Staff letter transmits 04-19-89 memo to PS and specifies dead- lines of 06-30-89 and 08-01-89 for a comprehensive report and an FS for product recovery, respectively. The comprehensive report shall contain an interpretation of all existing data and proposal for future work with a time schedule. The letter also states that staff would not recommend adoption of the C&A if the deadlines are met, all staff comments are addressed, and the TC members enter a formal agreement to complete the inves- tigation and remediation. 05-19-89 Staff memo finds SFPP report provided inconclusive evidence to be taken out of the C&A.