My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS: 8-495-5600 <br /> I <br /> A <br /> TO: Antonia Vorster I�, FROM: Robert Niblack <br /> Senior Engineer j',' Project Geologist <br /> DATE: 1 October 1987 SIGNATURE:, <br /> SUBJECT: PORT OF STOCKTON FUEL TERMINAL GROUND WATER INVESTIGATION, SAN <br /> JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> A report titled Groundwater Investigation Phase I: Hydroaeologic <br /> Setting and Site History Petroleum Storage and Handling Terminal was <br /> received by the Regional Board on 12 July 1987. A workplan for a <br /> proposed Phase II Investigation was also included. Both were prepared <br /> by Woodward-Clyde Consultants (WCC) . <br /> The following comments address the deficiencies of the report and <br /> workplan as they relate to Attachment 2 of our 16 June 1987 letter: <br /> GENERAL COMMENTS <br /> 1. The Port and the tenants involved in the ground water <br /> investigation have shown a willingness to define the extent of <br /> contamination at this site. They did initiate a ground water <br /> investigation. However, the magnitude of the problem at the Port <br /> requires a much greater effort than has been made at this time. <br /> 2 . Attachment 2 of our letter of 16 June 1987 was very specific as to <br /> the items to be addressed by this investigation. It indicated the <br /> scope of the investigation we feel is necessary for an adequate <br /> characterization of the problem at the fuel terminal area. The <br /> Port's response (the report and work plan) did not adequately <br /> address the minimum requirements in that attachment. <br /> 3 . Some major deficiencies include: <br /> 1. A lack of monitoring wells or proposal to install monitoring <br /> wells. No representative ground water samples are available <br /> from this area, nor is a mechanism to collect them proposed. <br /> 2 . No plan to fully characterize the hydrogeologyhas been <br /> proposed. <br /> 3 . No detailed time schedule for completion of tasks and phases <br /> was provided. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.