My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
3978
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518304
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:57:03 PM
Creation date
4/1/2020 4:08:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0518304
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0013818
FACILITY_NAME
LOW PRICE AUTO GLASS
STREET_NUMBER
3978
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17917103
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3978 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y <br /> 27 January 2006 <br /> y AGE-NC Project No. 02-0913 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> 4.2. SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> ` A total of twelve soil samples were analyzed from the two soil borings. BTEX compounds were <br /> reported detected in soil samples B 1-50 and B 1-60 at maximum concentrations of 0.026 milligrams <br /> per kilogram (mg/kg) benzene (B 1-60), 0.040 mg/kg toluene (B 1-60), 0.16 mg/kg ethyl-benzene <br /> (BI-60) and 0.220 mg/kg xylenes (131-60). Hydrocarbons were not detected at normal reporting <br /> limits in sample collected and analyzed from depths between 25 feet and 45 feet bsg, nor between <br /> 65 feet and 70 feet bsg. Hydrocarbons were not detected in samples from boring B2. <br /> No other constituent of concern,including fuel additives,were reported in the soil samples analyzed. <br /> y A summary of soil sample analytical results are presented in Table 1.The laboratory reports for soil <br /> samples (CTEL Project No. CT214-0511197 and CT214-0512111), QA/QC report, and chain-of- <br /> custody form are included in Appendix C. <br /> 1r <br /> 4.3. GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> y <br /> TPH-g and BTEX were not detected in ground water sample collected and analyzed. 1,2-DCA was <br /> detected in the ground water samples collected from borings B 1 and B2 at concentrations of 100µg/l <br /> and 20 gg/1, respectively. Figure 3 displays the 1,2-DCA concentrations at the site. <br /> The domestic well did not have reported detections of any constituents of concern. <br /> Y�1 <br /> No other constituents of concern were detected at or above laboratory detection limits in the ground <br /> water samples analyzed. The analytical results of the ground water samples collected on 05 August <br /> y 2005 are summarized on Table 2. The laboratory report for water samples (CTEL Project No. <br /> CT214-0511194), QA/QC report, and chain-of-custody form are included in Appendix D. <br /> Geotracker upload of the laboratory report electronic deliverable file(EDF)confirmation is included <br /> as Appendix E. <br /> y <br /> 5.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> b. Based on the data collected from the site, AGE finds: <br /> • There were no observable field indications of contamination in any of the soil samples <br /> collected from the soil probe borings. <br /> • The analytical laboratory reported BTEX compounds in two soil samples(131-50 and Bl-60) <br /> at maximum concentrations of 0.026 mg/kg benzene,0.040 mg/kg toluene,0.16 mg/kg ethyl- <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br /> y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.