Laserfiche WebLink
found in Section I. However, to facilitate the review process and enhance <br /> user accessibility, a table of contents should be provided and all pages <br /> should be numbered. <br /> The use of appendices to provide supplementary information is encouraged, but <br /> the site-specific information mast be contained in the main body of the SSP. <br /> For example, a contractor may wish to place a copy of the firm's heat stress <br /> prevention procedure in the SSP as an appendix for reference; this is fine, <br /> but the site-specific heat stress procedure mast be included in the body of <br /> the SSP. Note that information in the appendix is included to aid site <br /> personnel in the implementation of the SSP, not to provide additional review <br /> information for the TSCD industrial hygienist (see "Supplemental Review <br /> Information", below) . <br /> There is no set length for SSP's. A complex, large-scale remediation effort <br /> may require a job hazard analysis for each work category and other extensive <br /> plans; such a SSP could be over 100 pages long. Conversely, a SSP for a Site <br /> Investigation or Remedial Investigation at a simple site may take only 10 or <br /> 15 pages. Length, like most aspects of a SSP, is site-specific. <br /> Site-Specific SSP's <br /> While the SSP should be detailed yet concise, most importantly it must be <br /> site-specific. It should be noted that generic "boiler-plate" language is <br /> frequently rejected if it does not reflect conditions at the site. In <br /> particular, photocopied or verbatim EPA guidance material on topics such as <br /> levels of protection, decontamination protocol, or work zone criteria will <br /> not be accepted without information on how such items will be implemented for <br /> the project at hand. The project may be audited for compliance with the SSP <br /> by a TS® industrial hygienist; therefore, the site safety protocol should be <br /> accurately presented in the SSP. <br /> Sumlemental Review Information <br /> TSCD industrial hygienists frequently need additional information to properly <br /> evaluate an SSP. Some of this information may be found in documents that are <br /> not appropriate for inclusion in the SSP or its appendices, so they may be <br /> transmitted under sepa-rate cover. Examples include the firm's Health and <br /> Safety Progran/Policies arr d Procedures (for review of Medical Monitoring <br /> Program, Hazard Corumankation Respiratory Prottection Program, and <br /> Training Program) , rationale for P=E selection, and gsalifications of the <br /> Site Safety Officer. <br /> Contract-or/subcontract-or Issues <br /> In a situation where sena_rate SSP's are subritted for the subcontractors, <br /> these plans, as well as tyle SSP of the prime contactor, must state Who has <br /> the overall responsibi l_�' for site operations. For example, if <br /> contractor A <br /> uses subcon=-a=ors B and C on a project, the SSP's for B and C wi 11 <br /> typically state t:at r is responsible for ca rdi na`ting activities at the <br /> site. In many instances, eit'1e_r A. or one of the suns will be responsible for <br /> the decon area, air monitoring and Other se''Jices that are beneficial to <br /> everyone at the site (it would not be effective to have sepe-rate decon areas <br /> - 5 - <br />