My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006085
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2403
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545603
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006085
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 10:10:56 PM
Creation date
4/17/2020 1:57:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006085
RECORD_ID
PR0545603
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006095
FACILITY_NAME
PETERSON MFG
STREET_NUMBER
2403
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2403 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e� <br /> n <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> monitonng data (March 1992) determined groundwater flow direction to the south A detailed <br /> discussion of the initial subsurface investigation can be found in RESNA's "Interim Problem <br /> Assessment Report, Soil and Groundwater Contamination,"dated June 8, 1992 <br /> In July 1994, a RESNA field geologist observed the drilling of four additional groundwater <br />' monitoring wells (MW4, MWS, MW6, and MW7) at the site to further characterize subsurface <br /> conditions Groundwater samples collected from these additional wells contained no detectable <br />' petroleum hydrocarbons A detailed discussion of the Phase II Subsurface Investigation can be <br /> found in RESNA's "Summary Report, July 1994 Investigation,"dated August 26, 1994 <br /> In PHS/EHD correspondence dated March 1995, regulatory approval was given to sample wells <br /> MW3 and MW5 and wells MW4, MW6 and MW7 on an alternating semi-annual basis MW and <br /> MW2 were to be sampled every quarter, conditions permitting <br /> To further evaluate the extent of residual soil contamination in the vicinity of the former <br /> underground fuel storage tank (UST), Smith Technology supervised the advancement of four soil <br /> borings (SB-1, SB-2, SB-3, and SB-4) on February 29, 1996 to depths of approximately 16 to 26 <br /> feet bgs Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br /> xylenes (BTEX) were detected above method detection limits at low to moderate concentrations <br /> in samples collected at depths between 10 and 15 feet bgs in borings SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3 A <br /> detailed discussion of this subsurface investigation can be found in Smith Technology's <br /> "Subsurface Investigation Report, " dated April 30, 1996 <br />' 2.0 METHODS AND PROCEDURES <br /> 2.1 Soil Boring Advancement and Sampling <br /> To evaluate the extent of impacted soil and groundwater at the site, five soil borings (SB-11 <br />' through SB-15) were advanced at the site Three soil borings, SB-11, SB-12, and SB-15 were <br /> advanced to first encountered water, which ranged from 5 to 19 feet below ground surface (bgs) <br />' Soil borings SB-13 and SB-14 were be advanced to depths of approximately 26 to 27 feet bgs <br /> Boring locations are shown on Figure 2 <br />' The five borings were advanced using truck mounted Geoprobe® narrow diameter, direct push <br /> technology Drilling was conducted by Fisch Environmental (C57 License No 683865) An <br /> ATC field geologist was present to log all soil samples Descriptions of soil types encountered <br />' and sample collection intervals were recorded on boring logs contained in Appendix A Soil <br /> samples were collected at five-foot intervals, except at SB-14 where soil samples were collected <br /> continuously, and were field screened with a Flame Ionization Detection (FID) meter One soil <br /> sample each from borings SB-11, SB-12, SB-13, and SB-15 were submitted for laboratory <br /> analysis and two soil samples from boring SB-14 were submitted for laboratory analysis Sample <br /> selection was based on FID measurements and field observations (i a odor and soil discoloration) <br />' w 4ordproW803LSuh_mv doe 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.