Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 0 <br />SECONDARY PIPE TESTING <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Piping Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Test Method Used: ® Pressure ❑ Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic <br />Other (Specify) <br />Test Equipment Used: 0 to 15psi Dial Gauge <br />Equipment Resolution: o <br />2 /o 2 Mid Scale <br />Piping Run # 1 <br />87 Unleaded <br />Piping Run # 2 <br />89 Unleaded <br />Piping Run # 3 <br />92 Unleaded <br />Piping Run # <br />Piping Material: <br />Fiber glass <br />Fiber glass <br />Fiber glass <br />Piping Manufacturer: <br />Ameron <br />Ameron <br />Ameron <br />Piping Diameter: <br />3" <br />3" <br />3" <br />Length of Piping Run: <br />110' <br />110' <br />110' <br />Product Stored: <br />87 Unleaded <br />89 Unleaded <br />92 Unleaded <br />Method and location of <br />piping -run isolation: <br />See Notes. <br />See Notes. <br />See Notes. <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />I NA <br />NA <br />NA <br />Test Start Time: <br />Initial Reading <br />Test End Time: <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />Test Duration: <br />Change in Reading (RF -RI): <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or <br />Criteria: <br />0.00psi <br />0.00psi <br />0.00psi <br />Test Result <br />ElPass ❑Fail <br />®Pass ❑Fail <br />[]Pass [:]Fail®Pass <br />-]Fail <br />Comments — (Include information on repairs made prior to testing and recommended follow-up for failed tests.) <br />*Piping could not be isolated at the dispenser pans as secondary pipe is drilled just inside the penetration boots at a point to low for <br />the test boots to cover. This was possibly done to allow a lower drainage from within the sump. This would not allow a test of the <br />dispenser sumps as well. The owner is already taking bids for dispenser upgrades to include new under dispenser containment <br />and dispenser pan sensors. <br />