Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County • • <br /> Page 2 <br /> hazardous for this characteristic. These results were accepted by the <br /> destination facility with the classification of non-hazardous. This material <br /> will be analyzed again for Title 22 criteria when it is next scheduled for <br /> removal and disposal. <br /> 4. Violation Nos. 19 and 20: Shop Hazard Solutions picked up the 55 gal drum <br /> dated 5/12/08 on 6/10/09. Note—this drum was not hazardous waste and was <br /> improperly labeled. All hazardous waste containers have been properly <br /> labeled with the following - Start Accumulation Date, Hazardous Properties, <br /> Generator name & address, Physical State, Contents and the words <br /> "Hazardous Waste". <br /> 5. Violation No. 21: Corrected - All hazardous waste containers have been <br /> fitted with adequate storage lids. <br /> 6. Violation No. 33: Corrected — All containers have been properly labeled and <br /> dated. <br /> 7. Violation No. 45: Corrected—Copy of Contingency Plan attached. <br /> 8. Violation No. 49: Attached is a copy of the NorCal Distribution, Spill <br /> Control Procedures training document along with copies of the Universal <br /> Waste Policy and Liquid Product Disposal Procedures Summary. <br /> 9. Violation No. 64: The DC has approved a proposal from "Tracer E&T" to <br /> assess the used oil tank and update their SPCC Plan. Greg Hauser (Program <br /> Manager) will be on-site to begin the initial process at 10:00am tomorrow <br /> morning (7/29/09). Estimated time of completion is 4-6 weeks. <br /> 10. Violation No. 69: Daily inspections have begun and documented as of <br /> 5/27/09. <br /> June 10, 2009 Inspection: <br /> Violation No. 10: Alleged failure to determine if a waste is a hazardous waste; <br /> 22CCR66262.11 <br /> The inspection report ("Addendum to Hazardous Waste Inspection Report issued <br /> May 26, 2009") cited a number of grocery items that were observed in a truck at the <br /> Distribution Center. The inspector assumed that these were all waste,which is not <br /> the case by the very nature of many of the products referred to in the report. These <br /> items were in transit from various stores to the Distribution Center, where they were <br /> to be cross-docked to a truck destined for the Product Recovery Center (PRC). The <br /> PRC is a facility operated by a third party that is responsible for disposition of <br /> returned products. Safeway has had a contractual arrangement with PRC for over <br />