Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Mr.Ronald Rowe <br /> May 25, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> two soil samples were collected from the backhoe bucket per approval and under <br /> supervision of Ms. Lettitia Briggs (PHS/EHD). In the eastern half of the excavation, <br /> noticeable discoloration was evident on the sidewalls and the excavation bottom. <br /> Approximately 280 cubic yards of soil were removed from the USTi excavation. Excavated <br /> soil was stockpiled on plastic on site. PHS/EHD stockpile soil sample requirements, as <br /> verbally communicated from PHS/EHD to BC on May 6, 1999, were as follows: Two <br /> samples per 50 cubic yards to be composited in the laboratory to one sample for soil slated <br /> for backfilling into the excavation, or four samples per 100 cubic yards to be composited in <br /> the laboratory to one sample for material slated for landfill disposal.-'I Per Mr.Terry <br /> Tarditi, none of the stockpile soil was slated to be used for the diesel UST backfill material. <br /> The stockpile was segregated into two piles; one larger pile (approximately 16 feet wide by <br /> 80 feet long and 4 feet tall) and one smaller pile (approximately 16 feet wide by 30 feet long <br /> by 5 feet tall). A total of eight samples to be composited into two samples were collected <br /> from the larger stockpile; samples SP-1, SP-2, SP-3, and SP4 were composited in the <br /> laboratory into one sample, and samples SP-5, SP-6, SP-7, and SP-8 were composited in the <br /> laboratory into one sample. Three samples were collected from the smaller stockpile and <br /> were composited in the laboratory into one sample (SP-9, SP-10, aria SP-11). All sampling <br /> was observed by PHS/EHD. <br /> All soil samples were collected in brass tubes, immediately covered jwith foil, capped with <br /> plastic end caps,taped, labeled with the date, time, sample name, and analytical method, <br /> and placed into a cooled ice chest. The soil samples were courieredito Kiff Analytical (State <br /> certified# 2236) located in Davis, California for analysis. Each sample was analyzed for <br /> total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel[(TPHd) EPA method 80151modified] and benzene, <br /> ethylbenzene, toluene, and total xylenes [(BETX) EPA method 8260BD. <br /> Analytical Results <br /> Soil sample analytical results are summarized in Table 1. In summary, the soil sample <br /> collected at the west end of the UST excavation floor (W 1-16) contained 600 milligrams per <br /> kilogram (mg/Kg) TPHd and did not contain detectable concentrations of BETX. The soil <br /> sample collected at the east end of the UST excavation floor contained 3,100 mg/Kg TPHd <br /> and did not contain detectable concentrations of BETX. Stockpile!soil samples generally <br /> contained traces of ethylbenzene and/or total xylenes and elevated'concentrations of <br /> TPHd. The highest TPHd concentration (7,900 mg/Kg) was detected in composite sample <br /> SP-9, SP-10, SP-11 which consisted of the UST overburden and bottom material. <br /> Laboratory reports are attached as Exhibit A. <br /> Use or disclosure of data continued on this sheet is subject to the restriction specified at the'beginning of this document. <br /> } BCSACOI\P.\16000\16271\WRULN3.doc <br /> 4 <br /> i <br /> I <br />