Laserfiche WebLink
Third Quarter 1996 Groundwater Monitoring&Remediation Status Report <br /> Moore Petroleum, 14800 W Frontage Rd,Manteca,CA <br /> November 1, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> catalytic converters mounted on the exhaust pipe During this reporting period, soil vapor flow to <br /> the system has averaged 41 standard cubic feet per minute(SCFM) <br /> Vapor samples were collected from the system influent and effluent on August 16, September 10, <br /> and October 17, 1996 to demonstrate compliance with SJVUAPCD permit <br /> On August 16, 1996, the vapor extraction rate was 42 SCFM Based on the vapor sample <br /> analytical results for this date, the system extraction rate was 0 60 pounds per day(lb /day) of TPH, <br /> as gasoline, and benzene was below laboratory detection limits On September 10, 1996, the vapor <br /> extraction rate was 38 SCFM Based on the vapor sample analytical results for this date, the <br /> system extraction rate was 0 72 pounds per day(lb/day) of TPH, as gasoline, and benzene was <br /> below laboratory detection limits On October 17, 1996, the vapor extraction rate was 42 SCFM <br /> Based on the vapor sample analytical results for this date the system extraction rate was 0 60 <br /> lb/day ofTPH, as gasoline Benzene was not detected in the influent to the vapor extraction <br /> system on this date Air analytical results and cham-of-custody forms are contained in Appendix B <br /> As of October 17, 1996, the vapor extraction system has extracted approximately 2,390 lbs of <br /> TPH, as gasoline, and 7 8 lbs of benzene System operating data are contained in Table 3 Mass <br /> extraction rates to date, based on laboratory analytical results, are contained in Table 4 <br /> • On August 27, 1996, radius of mfluence measurements of the vapor extraction system were <br /> collected from all nine monitoring wells and the two remjection wells The measurements were <br /> taken by attaching a vacuum gauge to the PVC well casings and waiting approximately five minutes <br /> such that a vacuum equilibrium in the well casing could be attained Results of the radius of <br /> influence measurements are included in Table 5 <br /> Groundwater Remediation System <br /> On January 23, 1995, Emcon started a groundwater treatment system at the subject site The <br /> groundwater treatment system is pneumatically operated via compressed air supplied from the <br /> R S I unit and extracts groundwater from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4 <br /> Once the groundwater arrives in the remediation compound via V diameter PVC piping, it is <br /> filtered through two m-hne particulate filters and then through two in-line, 4001b carbon vessels <br /> Upon discharging from the carbon vessels, it is remjected through two remjection wells, RW-1 and <br /> RW-2, located to the west of the remediation compound (Figure 2) <br /> In August of 1996, the compressor which operates the water treatment system had a mayor <br /> mechanical failure Apex is currently reviewing the effectiveness of the water treatment system on <br /> the remediation of the groundwater at the subject site <br /> To date, the water treatment system has extracted 1 8 pounds (lbs ) of TPH, as gasoline, and 0 37 <br /> Mlbs of benzene System operating data is contained in Table 6 Mass extraction rates to date, <br /> based on laboratory analytical results, are contained in Table 7 <br />