COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

On March 26, 2012, Ms. Rivera sent a follow up letter to the January 24, 2012, hazardous wast inspection (Attachment 2) by certified mail. None of the items have been addressed. On June 19, 201?, the March 26, 2012, follow up letter was returned to the EHD, unclaimed by Mr. Exon. The letter was resent that day by regular mail. On July 23, 20121 Ms. Rivera called and explained to Mr. Exon that his return to compliance inforrtiation has not been submitted. Mr. Exon stated that he would submit the paperwork by the end of the month. On August 20, 2012, Ms. Rivera spoke to Mr. Exon while on site for an aboveground storage tank insp ction and explained to him that his return to compliance information has not been subitted. Mr. Exon stated that it is in progress and he expects to submit it in the next weeto r so. On November 6, 012, Ms. Rivera called and left a message for Mr. Exon explaining that his return to com fiance information has not been submitted. On November, 13, 2012, Ms. Rivera called and left a message for Mr. Mike Grant with Union Pacific Rail oad explaining that the return to compliance information has not been submitted for theanuary 24, 2012, hazardous waste inspection. Ms. Rivera also called Mr. Duffy, but her all went straight to voicemail. Ms. Rivera then called the main number for Union acific Railroad and left a message with Mr. Exon's supervisor, Mr. Mark Rimers. On December 7, 2012, Ms. Rivera returned a call from Mr. Rimers who stated that the return to complian e information should have been received by November 20th, but nothing had been 3ubmitted. On March 22, 201$, Ms. Rivera called and left a message for Mr. Rimers and Mr. Exon explaining that thelreturn to compliance information has not been submitted. On April 19'2013, Ms. Rivera called and spoke to Mr. John Thomas with Union Pacific Railroad and ex )I ined that the facility's annual permit fees for 2013 have not been paid and that a complet submittal has not been made to the California Environmental Reporting System CERS). All hazardous materials business plans, chemical inventories, site m ps, underground and aboveground tank data, and hazardous waste related data must e reported electronically into the CERS as of January 1, 2013. Mr. Thomas said that e would email Mr. Grant and Mr. Duffy. On April 23, 2013, s. Rivera received a call from Mr. Grant. Ms. Rivera explained the need to pay annua operating permit fees, electronic submissions to the CERS, and the return to compliance information needed for the January 24, 2012, hazardous waste inspection. Mr. Grant requested that Ms. Rivera resend him copies of the invoices, inspection report, end deficiency letter by email, which she did. On August 1, 2013 return to compliance documents were submitted in response to the January 24, 2012, azardous waste inspection (Attachment 3). Not all of the violations were properly addr. ssed. The contingency plan was not properly updated, and all spills were not addresse . There was no mention of how the unlabeled hazardous waste 2