Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />' Quarterly Monitoring Report,October 2000 <br /> • Canepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> Page-2 <br />' gasoline (TPH-G), and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) were present at the former location of the fuel <br /> dispenser islands <br />' Prior to granting approval of installation of the new SVE system, the Underground Storage Tank Clean-Up <br /> Fund indicated the need for additional investigation Condor subsequently conducted the installation and <br /> sampling of two soil borings adjacent to the SVE well array The investigation included soil vapor screening <br />' using a Simulprobe sampling device in soil vapor collection mode The results indicated high levels of <br /> volatile organic compounds were present in the soil vapor at the site The laboratory analytical results of the <br /> soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation are presented in Report — Soil and <br /> Groundwater Investigation, dated June 12, 1998 Operation of the SVE system has continued since its <br /> initiation on March 15, 1999 <br /> Due to a directive from the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (USTCF), laboratory analyses of <br /> groundwater samples for gasoline oxygenates/additives by EPA Method 8260 were discontinued <br /> beginning with the October 1999 quarterly groundwater monitoring event The USTCF indicated that <br /> analysis by EPA Method 8260 is not warranted based on historical groundwater laboratory analytical <br /> results Commencing with the October 1999 quarterly groundwater monitoring event, laboratory analyses <br /> of groundwater samples for gasoline oxygenates/additives are limited to MTBE using EPA Method 8020 <br /> or 8021B <br /> 3 0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING —OCTOBER 2000 <br /> • On October I2, 2000 a Condor representative collected groundwater samples from the eight monitor <br /> wells at the site (see Figure 3, Appendix A, for well locations) The sampling order was as follows MW- <br /> 3, MW-7, MW-8, MW-5, MW-4,MW-6, MW-2, and MW-1 <br /> 3 1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING OBSERVATIONS AND PARAMETERS <br /> The static water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01-foot with a battery-operated, flat <br /> tape, water-level meter A clean, single-use, polypropylene, disposable bailer was Iowered into each well <br /> to check for floating product, petroleum odors, and sheen Floating product was not observed in any of <br /> the monitor wells during the groundwater sampling The surface of the groundwater table was above the <br /> top of the well screens, however Olfactory observations were <br /> • Strong petroleum hydrocarbon odors detected in the groundwater sample collected from MW-1 and <br /> MW-2 <br /> + A moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odor detected in the groundwater sample collected from MW-4 <br /> • A slight petroleum hydrocarbon odor detected in the groundwater sample collected from MW-7 <br /> IPetroleum hydrocarbon odors were not noted in any of the other groundwater samples <br /> Gray colored water was noted in the groundwater samples from monitor wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-4, <br /> MW-h, and MW-7 A light brown roior wins noted in the sampie from MW-5 Fair water clarity was <br /> inoted in the samples from MW-2, MW-6, and MW-7 Poor water clarity was noted in the groundwater <br /> samples from MW-4 and MW-5 No color and good clarity were noted in the remaining groundwater <br /> samples <br /> Monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-8 were purged using new, disposable bailers Monitor wells MW-1, <br /> I and MW-3 through MW-7 were purged with Redi-Flow submersible pumps which were decontaminated <br /> prior to use Approximately three well casing volumes of water were purged from each well (see the <br /> Naliw <br /> i <br /> �� CONDOR <br />