Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Additional soil and Groundwater Investigation Report <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) - <br /> January 21,2002 <br /> Page 9 <br /> 5.0 SUMMARY/DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br /> lCondor personnel conducted soil and groundwater investigation activities from September 26, 2001 <br /> through October 26, 2001 at the site. CPT logs and direct push (hydropunch) water samples were <br /> collected from three site locations. Monitor wells MW-9 through MW-12d were drilled, constructed, <br /> developed, surveyed and sampled. In addition, soil samples were collected from soil borings SB-2 <br /> through SB-4 and the borehole for MW-11. <br /> The results of the soil sampling indicate that very little gasoline contamination remains in the site vadose <br /> zone in the locations sampled. This is consistent with recent results of the soil vapor extraction influent <br /> Isampling at the site. <br /> The results of the hydropunch groundwater sampling indicate that groundwater contamination is not <br /> present at or above the laboratory reported detection limits at the depths sampled in the locations of the <br /> I CPT-2 and CPT-3 clusters. These results suggest that the vertical extent of contamination has been <br /> adequately investigated in the northwest and northeasfportions of the site. The results of the groundwater <br /> sample collected at 100 to 110 feet bgs in the center of the contaminant plume (CPT-1 cluster) indicate <br /> that further monitoring of this horizon is necessary. MW-12d was installed to serve this purpose. The <br /> results of the groundwater sample collected from MW-12d serve as preliminary confirmation of the <br /> results of the hydropunch sample collected from 100 to 1 I0 feet bgs. However, additional sampling of <br /> MW-12d is necessary to establish typical groundwater quality there because the initial sampling results <br /> from the well may reflect some temporary, limited movement of contamination from upper horizons <br /> during the construction of the well. Development of the well may have been inadequate to remove the <br /> remnant contamination from above because of the lack of productivity of the well (only a limited amount <br /> lie of groundwater could be removed from the well during development). <br /> The results of the deepest groundwater sample collected in the location of the CPT-1 cluster(from 120 to <br /> 125 feet bgs) indicate that this deeper horizon was not impacted with gasoline constituents. Therefore, <br /> the vertical extent of contamination in this location (in the center of the contaminant plume) appears to <br /> be adequately investigated. <br /> I <br /> The results of the groundwater samples collected from MW-9 and MW-10 indicate that the shallowest <br /> groundwater in those locations is not impacted at or above the laboratory reported detection limits. The <br /> results of the groundwater sample collected from MW-11 indicate that groundwater in that location is <br /> Impacted with relatively low concentrations of gasoline constituents. The results of the new monitor well <br /> Isampling need to be confirmed during subsequent quarterly monitoring events. <br /> The contamination present in the location of MW-11 (based on the initial sampling event) is at <br /> significantly lower concentrations than has historically been present in groundwater samples collected <br /> Frnm MW-1 and 1V W— 11 -7� PVPn thnucrh MW-1 l is in c-Ime, proximity to MW-1 and MW-2. This is <br /> probably because the MW-11 well screen intersects the current water table and the MW-I and MW-2 <br /> well screens do not. The shallow water table groundwater in the location of MW-11 currently resides in a <br /> I soil horizon that was previously remediated by the site SVE system at a time when the groundwater was <br /> substantially deeper and the soil there was exposed to the SVE well screens. MW-1 and MW-2, however, <br /> are currently screened in groundwater that is in contact with relatively unremediated soil and are <br /> therefore exhibiting higher contaminant concentrations. <br /> 0 In addition to the soil and groundwater data collected, a new monitor well survey was conducted at the <br /> 1 site to comply with new electronic deliverable format (EDF) requirements. The results of the n <br /> V* NCI-6� <br /> Ii 41 CONDOR <br />