My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 8
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SIXTH
>
720
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009049
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2020 2:30:04 PM
Creation date
5/6/2020 1:50:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
FILE 8
RECORD_ID
PR0009049
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004041
FACILITY_NAME
UP TRACY RAIL YARD
STREET_NUMBER
720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
SIXTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25001014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
720 E SIXTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Page 2 of 3 <br /> signing for Arcadis is acceptable. <br /> What the EHD does not want is to send a bill out to the entity on the MFR only to <br /> have them call us later and say, "she's not authorized to sign for us" and we're not <br /> paying....so if you're the responsible one for ARcadis, then you can sign. if not, <br /> then go up the chain of command please. <br /> typically, if consultants take on the 'billing party' status, then the consultant PM for <br /> the site should sign and advise his accounts payable people it's ok to pay the EHD <br /> bills as they come in. I just had an unpleasant phone call with some one in Arcadis <br /> accounting for a CHevron site Arcadis was doing tell me "MR. xxxxx was not <br /> authorized to sign" our MFR....I'd rather not have to have this conversation with her <br /> again over THIS site... <br /> once this is cleared up, I can process your applications and meet your Aug 31 first <br /> drill date. <br /> btw, more confusion. The Gregg permit application, for 24 +2 borings and 5 wells, <br /> referrs to Fig 4 of wp ....I found fig 4 ("proposed Hydropunch locations", but I can't <br /> find the location of the 5 wells. are they "temporary well' (A zone)? or <br /> "Piezometer" (A zone)? or "Groundwater Monitoring Well" (A zone) ? listed in the <br /> legend? <br /> I'll need the specs for the monitoring wells too. <br /> Michael J. Infurna Jr. <br /> Senior RENS. CA Reg#5649 <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental <br /> Health Department (SJCEHD) <br /> 600 E. Main Street <br /> Stockton, CA. 95202-3029 <br /> office: (209)468-3454 <br /> pager: (209) 982-8771 <br /> email: minfurna@s.icehd.com <br /> NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of ARCADIS U.S., Inc. and its affiliates. All <br /> rights, including without limitation copyright, are reserved. The proprietary information contained in this e-mail <br /> message, and any files transmitted with it, is intended for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of <br /> this e-mail is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this e-mail in error and that <br /> 8/21/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.