Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County <br /> Department of Planning <br /> July 16, 1990 <br /> Page 4 <br /> potentially further reduce the dust impacts from this site. <br /> However, the actual mitigation measure proposed is not to <br /> "require" but only to "recommend" that the applicant <br /> conform to the requirements of the new APCD regulation. At <br /> a minimum, the mitigation measure should be a requirement <br /> that the pending regulation for fugitive dust, as proposed <br /> by the San Joaquin County APCD, be complied with. <br /> The DEIR also documents that the e::isting <br /> predominant air flow causes significant air quality <br /> problems. Given the information that the proposed quarry <br /> site has announced a mitigation measure to stockpile the <br /> prime soil for replacement, it would appear appropriate to <br /> require a mitigation measure that determines the location, <br /> height, phasing, and maintenance of the proposed <br /> stockpile given the geography of the prevailing winds from <br /> the west which will carry dust and contaminates into the 5 <br /> adjacent inhabited and urbanized areas. The only affective <br /> mitigation to control the dust impact is the proposed <br /> utilization of 10, 000 gallons of water per day which must <br /> be obtained from an existing well at the adjacent <br /> processing facility and trucked to the quarry area via a <br /> proposed access road. Given the existing water resource <br /> impact in the County of San Joaquin, using 300, 000 gallons <br /> of water a month for ten years to control dust hardly <br /> qualifies for a rational mitigation measure. <br /> 4 . Geology And Soils -- The Notice of <br /> Preparation (NOP) identified a significant impact in the <br /> Initial Study regarding the potential for slope failure <br /> relative to any excavation near the foot of the adjacent <br /> bluff on the south and east side of the project area which <br /> could result in erosion. The DEIR validates that <br /> excavation may endanger the stability of adjacent terrace 6 <br /> slopes. The proposed mitigation measure is to minimize the <br /> potential for any impact to slope stability of the bluff <br /> areas by requiring minimum setbacks for excavation. The <br /> mitigation measure proposes that the minimum setbacks be <br /> established by a soils engineer or certified engineering <br /> geologist. This mitigation measure is incomplete if it <br /> does not require that the Department of Public Works <br /> approve of the proposed minimum setback. <br />