Laserfiche WebLink
a recreation area. They will offer to deed the 10 acre parcel to <br /> the County. <br /> Page 4 , "biology, " the bridge is not being proposed to be located <br /> where they would like to have it. They will relocate the bridge so 5 <br /> that it is not sensitive to the salmon spawning problem. <br /> Page 6, "air quality, " paragraph 3 , he does not understand this. <br /> He talked with the Air Pollution Control District and the dust <br /> control measures were outlined to him. The Air Pollution Control <br /> District indicated that they want that area planted. That would 6 <br /> exceed the requirements of Regulation 7 . The 15 MPH speed limit is <br /> to mitigate dust, but they feel that with their provisions to <br /> mitigate dust, this could be raised to 25 MPH. Regarding noise, <br /> tl_ey would like the hours of operation changed to 6 : 00 a.m. to <br /> 8 : 00 p.m. <br /> Stair Harris, 4967 E. Acampo Rd. , representing Claude C. Wood Co. , <br /> made the following comments: <br /> Page 2 , regarding "wetlands, " the aggregate processing plant has <br /> been there for 35 years and they have been disposing of the wash <br /> water and developing quite a bit of silt. This can be used for 7 <br /> agricultural purposes. There would be no wetlands if they were not <br /> processing rock. The request is that they train the water that is <br /> currently being disposed of to go to the stock ponds (there is no <br /> stock there) . <br /> Page 3 , regarding "fresh water marsh would be impacted by using <br /> their access road, " there is no fresh water marsh. If they quit 8 <br /> their operation, that would dry up. <br /> Page 12 , regarding 11100 foot buffer zone, " the 100 foot buffer will 9 <br /> not clear up the jungle. It is a riparian habitat. That is a <br /> corrective measure. <br /> Mike Hakeem, Attorney, 2800 W. March Lane, referred to a proposed <br /> subdivision on a bluff overlooking the proposed quarry. He made <br /> the following comments: <br /> Page 95 states there is no application for adjacent development. <br /> In April 1990 an application was made for that subdivision. The <br /> question is as to the impact of this quarry operation on the <br /> subdivision. <br /> Page S-6, regarding the land use section of the analysis, stating <br /> that the long term use for extraction would be incompatible with <br /> existing commercial/residential uses. This impact is significant 10 <br /> and unmitigable and a statement of overriding considerations is <br /> needed for this impact. The summary states that it is reduced to <br /> less than significant level. Mr. Hakeem said he did not believe <br /> that both statements were true. <br /> PC MINUTES -2- 6-21-90 <br />