My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
8751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516580
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:47:36 PM
Creation date
5/8/2020 1:56:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516580
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012688
FACILITY_NAME
WILD ROSE VINEYARDS
STREET_NUMBER
8751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
VICTOR
Zip
95253
APN
05139005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8751 E HWY 12
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•� Civic Center Square <br /> 2444.Main Street, Suite 21 <br /> Fresno, California 937212734 <br /> (559)264-2535 v FAX(559) 2647431 �iE�D9QY�ta.�AO^.� <br /> May 30, 2001 <br /> Project 6508 <br /> Mr. Christopher Cochrane <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A <br /> Sacramento, California 95827-3003 <br /> Subject: Soil Assessment Work Plan <br /> Former Dole Fresh Fruit—Victor Fruit Operations <br /> Victor, California <br /> Dear Mr. Cochrane: <br /> In response to our recent discussions regarding the soil assessment of the percolation ponds at <br /> the former Dole Fresh Fruit—Victor Fruit Operations in Victor, California, Geomatrix <br /> Consultants, Inc., has prepared this letter to address comments provided by the California <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board—Central Valley Region (RWQCB) approving the <br /> March 12, 2001, "Work Plan for Soil Assessment." In a March 30, 2001, letter from the <br /> RWQCB, several comments were noted regarding the work plan. To summarize our <br /> discussion regarding the specific RWQCB comments,we have listed the RWQCB comment in <br /> bold italics followed by a summary of our agreed to items/approach. <br /> At two of the six sail borings, soil samples shall be collected at one foot intervals <br /> from the surface to 30 feet below ground level. This sampling procedure should <br /> clearly define the depth that waste(constituents of concern) has migrated through <br /> the soil column. <br /> Two of the six soil borings will be drilled to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs). The <br /> two borings will be continuously cored from the surface to 30 feet below ground level. <br /> Soil samples from the surface and from 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 feet bgs will be <br /> submitted to the laboratory for analysis of the constituents of concern. The remaining <br /> samples will be stored and will only be analyzed if necessary to refine the extent of <br /> impacted soil. <br /> The analytical method for analyzing the soil samples for constituents of concern is <br /> not specified in the report. We request-that the laboratory use the California WET <br /> with deionized water. <br /> We concur with your recommendation of using the California WET Test with <br /> deionized water(DI-WET) for analysis of the constituents of concern. The <br /> constituents of concern at this site are sulfate and chloride. In addition, soil pH and <br /> electrical conductivity also will be measured as indicators of the constituents of <br /> as aemstrec Carnsu tCants, Inc. <br /> Engineers, Geologists, and Environmental Scientists <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.