My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002476
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MCKINLEY
>
19051
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-88-16
>
SU0002476
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2020 10:27:47 AM
Creation date
5/14/2020 4:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002476
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-88-16
STREET_NUMBER
19051
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MCKINLEY
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
19051 S MCKINLEY
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cur with the Conditions of Approval listed in the staff report. This <br /> property has been used for a feedlot for many years. Mr . Ronyak said <br /> he has a contract with the Nestles plant to take the coffee grounds <br /> and this contract terminates in five years . At the end of the five <br /> years the property will no longer be used for placement of the coffee <br /> grounds . He said that virtually no complaints have been registered <br /> with the exception of 1987 . In 1987 they made a mistake and learned <br /> their lesson. They had to go before the Local Health District and <br /> straighten out the problem. The record is very clean except for the <br /> 1987 incident. The recent inspection by the Local Health District ' <br /> indicates that there are no problems . <br /> Mike Quartaroli , 160 Northgate, Manteca, Engineer for the applicant, <br /> was present and made the following points: He worked many hours with <br /> staff on this project. Concerning the most westerly pond, since the <br /> piping is not in place, the liquid effluent is pumped out of the pond. <br /> They will submit a Waste Management Plan to the Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board. The field to the north is not adequate to accommodate <br /> all of the solid and liquid waste generated by this operation. Piping <br /> will be constructed in the Spring or in the Summer to tie it into the <br /> irrigation system to irrigate the field to the north. Access to the <br /> site for trucks will not cause a problem. The trucks are open, <br /> however, all of the material that comes to the site is in a wet state. <br /> It does not blow off the trucks . The trucks that come to the site do <br /> not use McKinley from Yosemite Avenue, south, because of the railroad <br /> crossing. Trucks, therefore, take Airport Way , drive to the site via <br /> Woodward Avenue to the site from the south. The Manteca wastewater <br /> treatment plant and settling ponds are in the area. A corn crop was <br /> plowed under and chicken manure was spread on the parcel . Those two <br /> uses produce odor in the area. This is an agricultural area. Cannery <br /> waste will cease to be brought to the property in a couple of months <br /> and then there will only be coffee grounds coming to the site. <br /> Comm. Gillispie asked if there was enough soil on the property to take <br /> care of six years of coffee grounds. Mr. Quartaroli responded that <br /> the use of the soil that is along McKinley Avenue will be paced so <br /> that it will last six years. The contract specifies a 50-50 mix. The <br /> soil amendment is sold to landscaping companies and it is not bagged <br /> on the property. <br /> In answer to a question, Mr . Islas said there are 11, 000 cubic yards <br /> of coffee grounds on the property at this time. <br /> Mr. Herum asked the Commission to have a deep appreciation of the <br /> agricultural setting of the area. The application uses are agri- <br /> cultural uses and this is in an agricultural zone. <br /> Comm. Morri asked if the cannery mud was coming from strictly <br /> San Joaquin County or if it came from adjacent counties . Mr. Herum <br /> replied that everything is coming from the Stockton area. <br /> Mr . Islas pointed out that in the conditions listed in the staff <br /> report, the cannery mud is not included in this project. <br /> PC: 9/15/88 -2- MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.