My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE (2)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 11:15:09 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 10:55:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•Geocon Consultants, Inc. • • <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:Mlnfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3 :48 PM <br /> To: Richard Dreessen <br /> Subject: RE: Ranch Market Drilling Permits <br /> Good plan. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Btw, in all your calls with the City and all, did you ever speak to anyone (Scott) at San <br /> Joaquin County Public Works Department about the boring in the roadway? <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Richard Dreessen [mailto:dreessen@geoconinc.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3 :16 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Ranch Market Drilling Permits <br /> I will have corporate cut checks for each spermit for $294. That can go with the <br /> previously submitted $89 for each permit. I would like to keep each site permit separate <br /> checks. So if the Fund later comes back on something I can show 5 permits, 5 checks. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Rick Dreessen <br /> Senior Geologist <br /> Geocon Consultants, Inc. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:25 PM <br /> To: Richard Dreessen <br /> Subject: RE: Ranch Market Drilling Permits <br /> I don't know what to say about the permit fees. . .exhaustion May 5? <br /> Fatigue? Stupidity? Can't say, but I DO know when I wrote the work plan approval in <br /> Sept, this Clean Up Fund (CUF) site that is NOT a I'D-- <br /> category <br /> D"category has SJ County permit fees for installations that include 3-hours of inspection <br /> time with the $89 installation fee or $60 destruction fee. Hour rate is $98/hour times <br /> three equals $294 . Pluse the $89 equals $383 per. Ranch Market is a non-D LOP site and ALL <br /> LOP sites that are NOT classified as a "D" site with the Clean Up Fund pay this amount. <br /> The "D" sites also pay inspection fees, but they have an account set up and are billed for <br /> the time EHD is onsite. No account set up system is in place for Non D sites, so we <br /> collect the inspection fee up front. <br /> I'm sorry for the confusion with the May email. I made a mistake. The official work plan <br /> approval letter was the first and right amount. <br /> I checked with EHD management to see if I can allow less than the $383 per application. <br /> I was advised No. The full amount for each permit is required. <br /> Sorry again for the confusion. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Richard Dreessen [mailto:dreessen@geoconinc.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12 :13 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Ranch Market Drilling Permits <br /> Dear Mike; <br /> I am sending this email copy from May 5 in regard to your most recent email of today May <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.