My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PALM
>
11651
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0503361
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:31:06 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 3:13:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0503361
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0005798
FACILITY_NAME
SOUTHWEST HIDE COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
11651
STREET_NAME
PALM
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
22809005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
11651 PALM LN
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF C.1.1-1 FORNIA—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PETE WILSON.Gov„r <br /> CALIF(_,)R,NIA REGIONAL WA- I OUALITY CONTROL B.OARD— <br /> C_.>'NTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 ROUTIER ROAD. SUITE A <br /> SACRAMENTO,CA 95827-3098 <br /> PHONE: (916)255-3000 z:77. .7717-: <br /> FAk (916)255-3015 <br /> 19 December 1994 <br /> "114N, HEALIH <br /> Mr DOLICI Ohland NVUUNNIr <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Southwest Hide Companv <br /> P.O. Box 795 <br /> Modesto CA 95353 <br /> CLOSURE OF CLASS 11 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, SOUTHWEST HIDE <br /> COINIPANY, 11651 PALM LANE, MANTECA, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY (Case <br /> X <br /> No. 2664) <br /> Regional Board staff have reviewed your request for Closure of the Class H surface impoundments <br /> at your facility in Manteca. We concur with Your request to complete closure, although, as <br /> discussed below, we do not agree with your use of the Threshold Limit Value for determination of <br /> background in this context. Our principal concern is with the mitigation of the ground water <br /> impacts at this site, and we regard cleanup Of contaminated soils and closure of the impoundments <br /> as important steps in the site remediation process.: herefore, subject to the concerns and <br /> limitations expressed in this letter, YOU may proceed to backfill the impoundment arca with clean <br /> soil. <br /> 1. REVIEW OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS .AND DETERMINATION OF <br /> IMPOUNDMENT LEAKAGE: <br /> In reviewing the analvtical results of the ten samples from the impoundment subliner and berm <br /> soils, we noted a significant range of values in the concentrations of TDS and chlorides <br /> (i.e.,chlorides ranged from not detected to 12,000 ppm and TDS from 540 ppm to 11,000 ppm). <br /> Sample SLB-4, taken from the north berm of the eastern impoundment, was the highest (TDS <br /> 11,000 ppm, chlorides = 12,000 ppm). Five other samples (three from berms, two from subliner <br /> soils) contained significant TDS (1900 to 5300 ppm). The remaining four samples contained TDS <br /> concentrations in the range of several hundred ppm. This uneven "clustering" of analytical results <br /> 1.) t7 <br /> is also evident in soil samples from other portions of the Southwest Hide site, although the highest <br /> concentrations from other areas are many times higher than any obtained from the impoundments <br /> area. <br /> Regarding the entire Southwest Hide site, the sample location maps show that high concentrations <br /> Of TDS and chlorides OCCLIr in "hot spots", vdille some other areas exhibit very low concentrations. <br /> These results cannot be attributed to variation in soil properties: In a June 1994 site visit, staff <br /> observed that the soils are dominantly fine sands and silts. Therefore. our review of the soil <br /> samplino, results and site conditions Supports the suggestion that historical site practices contributed <br /> significantly to soil contamination. Because the berms around the impoundment. - <br /> were C011SILI'LICLCLI. <br /> Of on-site soils, some contamination in the berms is expected. Because the impoundments were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.