Laserfiche WebLink
I03 August 2005 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 02-0950 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br /> preservative After collection,the samples were properly labeled,placed in a chilled container, and <br /> transported under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a California <br /> Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified analytical laboratory,for analysis The samples were <br />' analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and diesel (TPH-d) In <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and total xylenes(BTEX)and fuel additives methyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether(MTBE),tertiary-butyl alcohol(TBA), di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl tertiary- <br /> butyl.ether(ETBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane(1,2-DCA),and <br /> 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B, and <br /> • Lead in accordance with EPA Method 6010B <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 24 March 2005 The contaminant Impact to soil and ground water was quantified from laboratory <br /> analytical data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> At the time of the March 2005 sampling event, depths to ground water ranged from 16 91 feet <br /> (MW-1)to 17 20 feet(MW-2 and MW-3)below the tops of the well casings Ground water elevation <br /> ' at the site averaged approximately 9 28 feet below mean sea level(MSL), Indicating an Increase in <br /> ground water elevation of approximately 3 feet between December 2004 and March 2005 (Table 1) <br /> During this monitoring event,the ground water levels in the wells were at least 2 feet below the tops <br /> of the well screens, Indicating that the wells are screened properly to yield representative shallow <br /> ground water samples <br /> ' The general ground water was Inferred to be flowing toward the northwest under a hydraulic gradient <br /> of approximately 0 009 foot/foot (ft/ft) Figure 3 Illustrates the contoured ground water elevations <br /> as measured on 24 March 2005 Ground water directions and gradients can vary greatly, as they are <br /> ' influenced by seasonal changes to the static water table <br /> 1 <br /> • <br /> ' Advanced GcoEnvironmentai,Inc <br /> r <br />