SU0013344 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PC: 6-17-93 GP-92-13/ZR-92-16 Water Supply Policy #-7: Any General Plan Amendment, or Subsequent Plan for any new or expanded community, approved by the County shall not result in an Increased demand upon the water supply available to San Joaquin County as of April 1, 1991. The applicant has submitted information regarding water usage and demand for only 25 of the 35 acres included in the application. The Department of Public Works has stated that because the information submitted for the 25 acres indicates that the water usage is only adequate for uses with low water usage, and not for all uses allowed under the General Industrial zone, all individual uses must be analyzed for their consistency with the policy. No information has been submitted regarding the water usage for the 10 acres of the project site located on the east side of Hansen Road. Therefore, since information has not been submitted for the entire project site, it cannot be shown that the application is consistent with this General Plan policy. Growth Accommodation Implementation #13: In reviewing an application for a General Plan 2010 Map amendment, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors shall consider the overall consistency of the proposal with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, and should also consider the following: (1) what physical, social, or economic factors exist that were not considered at the time of General Plan adoption and the evaluation of the proposal based on this new information; No information has been submitted which indicates that there have been changes in any physical, social or economic factors since the General Plan was adopted in July 1992. (2) existing, reasonable, alternative sites in the vicinity that are planned for the use and can accommodate the proposal; A review of the County's General Plan and the City of Tracy's Draft Urban Management Plan indicates that there are other areas which are already designated for industrial development that could accommodate the proposed use. (3) the potential for the proposal to establish an undesirable, growth-inducing precedent; and Due to the amount of land currently planned for industrial development in areas where infrastructure is already in place, it is not anticipated that the project will be growth inducing. However, if the project is approved with the conditions being recommended for inclusion as a part of the rezoning application, this application could be precedent setting. There could be precedent for expanding the industrial in this area due to the fact that the project will provide public access to an area currently served by private access, improve a bridge to a standard that is adequate for public access, and extend public services into a new area. A circulation problem has been identified by the Department of Public Works if the project does set a precedent for additional requests for non-agricultural land use designations. Currently, Hansen Road -8-