Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Quarterly Monitoring Report—First Quarter of 2010 Page 5 <br /> ' TURNER ROAD VINTNERS April 30, 2010 <br /> WKA No. 5279.03 <br /> 5.0 RESULTS OF MONITORING AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS <br /> ' 5.1 Site Groundwater Conditions <br /> Groundwater DTW at the site ranged from 12.42 feet below-top-of-casing (btoc) in monitoring <br /> ' well MW2 to 24.65 feet btoc in monitoring well MW3. Groundwater elevations (GWE) based <br /> on the DTW measurements and measured top of casing elevations at the site ranged from <br /> ' 0.43 feet ms] in MW3 to +4.43 feet msl in MW2. It should be noted that MW3 is located on <br /> the East Facility,nearly 3,300 feet east of the other monitoring wells. <br /> ' The direction of groundwater flow on March 17, 2010 was calculated to be southeasterly with a <br /> gradient of 0.0010. Figure 3 depicts estimated groundwater elevation equipotential contours and <br /> water levels at the site as measured on March 17, 2010. Historically, groundwater flow has been <br /> primarily east-southeast at a relatively flat gradient. <br /> 5.2 Site Water Quality Conditions <br /> ' First quarter 2010 groundwater analytical results indicate a general consistency in the reported <br /> concentrations of the constituents of concern since sampling began in 2004. A summary of <br /> reported concentrations, as determined by chemical analyses of the required constituents of <br /> concern, is presented in Table 3. Time series plots of the parameters TDS (plus groundwater <br /> elevation) for each of the monitoring wells are included as Charts 1 through 5. Appendix A <br /> ' includes the laboratory report and a copy of the chain-of-custody for this sampling event. <br /> ' 5.3 Data Quality <br /> All samples were received by the laboratory under documented chain-of-custody. United States <br /> ' Environmental Protection Agency SW-846 (EPA 2000)protocols for sample storage and <br /> preservation were followed. Qualifiers were attached to all pH results since the samples <br /> ' exceeded the analytical method hold time. <br /> The spike recovery was outside the QC acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD due to analyte <br /> concentration at 4 times or greater the spike concentration. The QC batch was accepted based on <br /> LCS and/or LCSD recoveries within the accepted limits. <br />