Laserfiche WebLink
' 0 <br /> ' NOA Environmental Project Number E98191 <br /> ' indicate buried hardpan in old soil horizons. Extensive hardpan development throughout the surface <br /> of the Victor Formation indicates a degree of maturity consistent with its Pleistocene age and an <br /> absence of recent sedimentation. This is in contrast to the west side of the valley,where alluvial fans <br /> ' have been forming in recent times. <br /> The Victor Formation has a gentle homoclinal dip toward the west along its uppermost surface. This <br /> is assumed to represent the top of the formation. In Sacramento County the top of the formation <br /> slopes about 1 meter per kilometer(m/km) and the base dips westward at about 2 m/km, indicating <br /> a gradual thickening tot he west. Throughout most of the east side area,the Victor Formation is as <br /> much as 30 meters thick and to the west, where it dips beneath a cover of younger materials, it <br /> probably attains a thickness of about 45 meters. <br /> ' The Victor formation is the most important water-bearing formation for domestic and shallow <br /> irrigation wells on the southeast side of the basin. It has moderate permeability thoroughout most of <br /> ' its area of occurrence. It is considerably more permeable than the underlying Laguna Formation,but <br /> because of its limited saturated thickness,high-capacity irrigation wells must be deep enough to tap <br /> aquifers in the Laguna Formation also. <br /> There are insufficient data on wells drilled solely in the Victor Formation to evaluate its water- <br /> producing potential. Yields are not generally expected to exceed 3,6001/min,but some wells located <br /> in more permeable portions where sand an gravel channels are present may have yields of up to <br /> 7,20001/min. Davis and Olmstead(196 1)refer to a 31-meter well near Sacramento,completed only <br /> in a Victor aquifer as having a yield of 6,0001/min and a specific capacity of 420 I/min/m <br /> ' SITE MONITORING METHODOLOGIES AND SPECIFICATIONS <br /> ' Groundwater Monitorine Well Locations: <br /> So as to conform with the requirements of the CVRWQCB WDR Order No.99-103,2 August, 1999 <br /> ' a plan for the installation of three (3) Groundwater Monitoring Wells is herein proposed. The <br /> placement of these groundwater monitoring wells presupposes that the groundwater gradients in the <br /> area are stratigraphically controlled. Groundwater in the first saturated zone appears to be flowing <br /> ' in a westerly/northwesterly direction. <br /> The proposed locations of the Groundwater Monitoring Wells are depicted in the Appendix portion <br /> of this work plan. <br /> It is proposed to construct the"upgradient"well on the TRV East Facility. The well is proposed to <br /> ' be constructed as close as possible to the western property boundary approximately one hundred and <br /> fifty feet(150') northwest of the stormwater detention pond. The exact location will be dependent <br /> ' on site access and underground utility location,and will be determined in the field at the time that the <br /> well is constructed. <br /> The two (2) "downgradient" wells are proposed to be constructed on the TRV West facility. It is <br /> Page -9- in <br />