My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013380
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
GP-89-11
>
SU0013380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2020 4:22:18 PM
Creation date
6/2/2020 4:07:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013380
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
GP-89-11
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376-
APN
20904003
ENTERED_DATE
5/29/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
PATTERSON PASS RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.1 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM <br /> Noise <br /> Table 7.1 -continued <br /> Timing or <br /> Person/ Frequency <br /> Monitoring Agency of <br /> Impact Mitigation Measure Requirements Responsible' Monitoring' <br /> ■ NOISE <br /> 4.16-1 Residential development, schools, 4.16-1(a) The siting of residential or other noise-sensitive land uses Review at G-PA SP SJCCDD GRA SP <br /> and other noise-sensitive land uses adjacent to Interstate 205 should he avoided. Future stage. <br /> on the project site would be residences should be located outside the 65-L, freeway noise <br /> exposed to excessive noise levels, contour. <br /> especially in the area between <br /> Grant Line Road and I-205. <br /> 4.16-1(b) Locating noise-sensitive land uses as far as possible from Review at SP stage. SJCCDD SP <br /> major roadways is the preferable solution. When this is not <br /> feasible, or desirable, earth berms, or sound walls could be <br /> built between the noise source and the noise-impacted area. <br /> Typically, an earth berm provides 3 dB of additional noise <br /> attenuation over a sound wall of the same height. A sound <br /> wall at the top of an earth berm is more aesthetically <br /> pleasing than a sound wall of the same total height but, its <br /> performance to act as a noise barrier is inferior to an earth <br /> berm (Figure 4.16-3). Further noise level reductions to an <br /> I., of 60 dB could be achieved through proper site planning <br /> and building orientation, construction of earth berms or <br /> sound walls, or a combination of more than one of these <br /> methods. Site specific mitigation measures should be <br /> determined on a case-by-case basis. <br /> 4.16-1(c) Schools Should not be sited in areas exposed to noise levels Review at SP stage. S.LCCDD SP <br /> alxrvc an L,,,, of 60 dB. the land use plan should be revised <br /> to relocate two proposed high schools and three elementary <br /> schools. <br /> 4.16-1(d) At the time of the Specific Plan. acoustical studies should be Review at SP stage. SJCCDD SP <br /> required for noise-sensitive land uses proposed to be located <br /> in areas exposed to noise levels alxrvc an L& of 60 dB. <br /> Appropriate mitigation measures should be recommended in <br /> these studies and implemented by the appropriate party to <br /> ensure that the L. of 60 dB is not exceeded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.