Laserfiche WebLink
' • 18 July 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 96-0254 <br /> Page 3 of 17 <br /> 2 4 UST REMOVAL <br /> ' AGE was informed that three USTs, dispensers and piping were removed from the site on 31 July <br /> f 1991, and that the removal was witnessed by a representative of the EHD, additional information <br /> regarding history of the UST use, tank tests,product Inventory and repairs are not known to AGE <br /> ' Six soil samples were collected from the sidewalls during the 31 July 1991 excavation, at a depth <br /> of five feet below surface grade (bsg), no excavation floor samples were collected because <br /> groundwater was encountered in the excavation at a depth of approximately six feet In addition,one <br /> ' grab groundwater sample was collected from the excavation and one soil sample was collected <br /> beneath the piping/dispenser area The soil and ground water samples were analyzed for TPH-g, <br /> BTEX, lead and ethylene dibromide (EDB) <br /> ' Concentrations of TPH-g and BTEX compounds were detected in each soil sample collected from <br /> the UST excavation TPH-g was detected from the east wall of the UST excavation at a maximum <br /> ' concentration of 62 milligrams per kilogram(mg/kg)and from the west wall of the UST excavation <br /> at a maximum concentration of 26 mg/kg Benzene was not detected above the elevated detection <br /> limits in the soil samples collected from the UST excavation walls Lead was detected at a maximum <br /> '• concentration of 10 mg/kg EDB was detected in one sample at a concentration of 2 9 mg/kg <br /> TPH-g and BTEX compounds were detected in the water sample at concentrations of <br /> I 150,000 micrograms per liter (µg/1) and 25,000 gg/l, 43,000 gg/l, 5,700 µg/1 and 32,000 µg11, <br /> respectively Lead was detected at a concentration of 0 67µg/1 in the water sample,however,EDB <br /> ' was not detected <br /> ' 3.0. ASSESSMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL AND GROUND WATER <br /> On 24 June 1997,a total of nine soil probe bonngs(BI through B9)were advanced at the site under <br /> EHDoversight Probe bonngs were advanced in the area of the former USTs,and northward towards <br /> the property line(Figure 2) Soil inprobebonngsBlthrough B5were continuously sampled(cored), <br /> whereas soil in probe boring B6 was sampled at the vadose zone/ground water interface In addition, <br /> ' grab ground water samples were collected from BI through B9 The grab ground water samples and <br /> selected soil samples were analyzed for TPH-g,TPH-d,BTEX and methyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE), <br /> however, soil samples collected from probe boring BI were not analyzed, because field screening <br /> ' with a organic vapor monitor (OVM)indicated that the samples were not impacted by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons <br /> ' TPH-g was detected in six soil samples collected from four of the probe borings,B2,B3,B4 <br /> and B5 TPH-g was detected at concentrations as high as 5,000 mg/kg(B5-6') at depths of <br /> • 8 feet bsg or less TPH-g concentrations detected in soil from depths greater than 8 feet bsg <br /> ' Advanced GeoEnv ronmental,Inc <br /> I <br />