Laserfiche WebLink
estate agent and people came to him requesting lot splits from <br /> their properties before the ordinance was changed. He said he did <br /> not see how it would be possible to monitor income from sons and <br /> daughters helping out on the farm in order for them to qualify for <br /> a lot split. He said the purchase of farm land for speculated <br /> development has driven up the price of this land. He said there <br /> are "developer-farmers" <br /> and then there are "farmers, " and it would <br /> be difficult for the Planning Commission to determine the differ- <br /> ence. Mr. Hesseltine said he could sympathize with a request from <br /> a legitimate farmer who wants to retire from his farm and stay in <br /> his home. He said he was also concerned about abuse of Williamson <br /> Act provisions. <br /> Bruce Blodgett, representing the San Joaquin Farm Bureau, spoke in <br /> support of the proposed Text Amendment. He read a letter from the <br /> Department of Conservation (addressed to him) , which he submitted <br /> into the record. The letter was in support of the Text Amendment. <br /> Norma Norton (30327 E. Highway 120, Escalon) objected to the Text <br /> Amendment. She said her husband passed away and she has had to <br /> continue the farming operation by herself. <br /> Roger Elissagary (7855 W. Valpico Rd. , Tracy) said that a homesite <br /> split should have a restriction of 10 years before it can be sold. <br /> Leroy Ornellas (20749 Lammers Rd. , Tracy) said he is a dairy farmer <br /> and he felt that legitimate farmers should be given the right to <br /> cut off a homesite. He objected to the Text Amendment. He said he <br /> is not in favor of the Farm Bureau recommendation. <br /> Jeff Harper (840 E. Mettler Rd. , Lodi) said that when a homesite is <br /> created for financing purposes only, it should be created only for <br /> a temporary period of time; and at the conclusion of that time <br /> period, the homesite parcel should be merged back with the parent <br /> parcel. <br /> John Eilers (21355 Walnut Drive, Linden) spoke in support of the <br /> proposed Text Amendment and commended the committee who worked on <br /> it. He said the provisions are simple and will help protect <br /> agriculture. He said there are now many houses on agricultural <br /> land and this doubles the price of agricultural land for those <br /> people who wish to get into farming. He said that some additional <br /> wording should be added to (a) (1) "except under provisions which <br /> provide the parcel should be above the zone minimum. " He said that <br /> when the farm land is protected, the farmer is also protected. <br /> Karen Cambra (205 Oleander, Manteca) said she has 29 acres and she <br /> would like to give a parcel each to her two daughters. <br /> Don Moyer (P.O. Box 207, Ripon) stated the following about the <br /> ordinance: <br /> • It does not allow retirement parcels. <br /> -3c- <br />