My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008403
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2040
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506560
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2020 8:34:24 AM
Creation date
6/22/2020 8:18:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008403
RECORD_ID
PR0506560
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004535
FACILITY_NAME
CAL-FARM SUPPLY
STREET_NUMBER
2040
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14503004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2040 W WASHINGTON
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton <br /> Mr. Charles Whitworth <br /> Cal-Farm Supply <br /> 14 July 1989 <br /> Page 7 <br /> o Five, five-gallon containers of Ordram 8-E with the original labels <br /> from the Stauffer Chemical Company on it. <br /> a Eight or nine five-gallon containers of TSI Silvisar 550. <br /> It is assumed that the Ordram and Silvisar still contain product because the <br /> containers appear to be intact, and there was no evidence of leakage or <br /> z staining on the floor area around these containers. However, staining was <br /> evident around the Alfa-Tax containers indicating that the product might have <br /> leaked out. <br /> RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES <br /> Results of laboratory analyses are summarized in Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. <br /> Tables 3 and 4 contain the results of the TPH, BXTE, and nitrate analyses <br /> performed on the soil and groundwater samples. Nitrate concentrations <br /> detected in surface soil samples are presented in Table 5 and results of the <br /> pesticide analyses performed on the surface soils and wipe samples are <br /> provided in Tables 6 and 7. Laboratory data sheets including quality <br /> assurance/quality control data sheets are presented in Attachment E for soils <br /> analyses and Attachment F for groundwater analyses <br /> Relevant Criteria <br /> Potentially relevant criteria are listed in the tables for constituents for <br /> which criteria are available. These criteria include drinking water standards <br /> such as the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for nitrate and DHS action <br /> levels for BXTE. Action levels for chemicals in soil are determined on a site <br /> specific basis. Action levels are typically derived by multiplying the <br /> drinking water standard by a factor of up to 1,000 to calculate allowable <br /> concentrations of chemicals in soil . This approach has been used by both the <br /> EPA and the DHS. However, a conservative attenuation factor of 100 (a 10-fold <br /> unsaturated zone attenuation factor and a 10-fold factor to account for <br /> dilution at the interface with the saturated zone) was utilized for the Cal - <br /> Farm soils to calculate soil criteria Petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) do not <br /> have established criteria for soils or groundwater. Action levels for these <br /> chemicals were estimated using a leaching potential analysis as recommended by <br /> the California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LOFT) Field Manual The <br /> leaching potential analysis is provided in Attachment G. <br /> For pesticides in soil the Total Threshold Level Concentration (TTLC) is <br /> referenced as an action level even though the TTLC was developed to define <br /> hazardous wastes The TTLC has been established by the State of California <br /> for the compounds DDT and methoxychlor in soils. To obtain estimates for soil <br /> criteria for the pesticides which do not have established TTLCs or drinking <br /> water standards, the ratio of the oral rate LDS, to the TTLC for DDT was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.