My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013451
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LAKE FOREST
>
2248
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
WC-90-1
>
SU0013451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2021 4:00:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 11:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013451
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
WC-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
2248
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LAKE FOREST
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
00306001
ENTERED_DATE
6/17/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2248 W LAKE FOREST RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1834
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> • one large excavated pit on the north shore of the Mokelumne River (origin unknown);and <br /> • one large pit on the northern shore of Tracy Lake (origin also unknown). <br /> These historic features have not been determined to be either architecturally nor historically unique or <br /> significant. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> State regulations regarding cultural resources are described in the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> (CEQA), Appendix K and Appendix G. Both state and federal laws may be applicable for the protection <br /> of cultural resources. CEQA provides that if a "project may cause damage to an important <br /> archaeological resource, the project may have a significant effect on the environment" (CEQA <br /> Guidelines, Appendices G and K). <br /> CEQA provisions regarding archaeological resources affected by earthmoving projects have been modified <br /> by Section 21083.2 of the Public Resources Code(AB 952),which requires that a lead agency determine: <br /> 1) whether a project will have a significant effect on archaeological resources; and 2) whether such <br /> resources are important. According to Appendix K, Section III of CEQA, an important archaeological <br /> resource is one which: <br /> A. Is associated with an event or person of: <br /> 1. Recognized significance in California or American history, or <br /> 2. Recognized scientific importance in prehistory; <br /> B. Can provide information which is both of demonstrable public interest and useful in addressing <br /> scientific consequential and reasonable archaeological questions; <br /> C. Has a special or particular quality such as oldest, best example, largest, or last surviving example of <br /> its kind; <br /> D. Is at least 100 years old and possesses substantial stratigraphic integrity, or <br /> E. Involves important research questions that historical research has shown can be answered only with <br /> archaeological methods. <br /> Only one of the above criteria needs to be met to qualify a site for protection as an important <br /> archaeological resource. The Tracy Lakes Complex is one of the few aggregates of sites in central <br /> 4.9-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.