Laserfiche WebLink
4.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains. . . ." <br /> S <br /> Native Californian burials have been retrieved from two sites and,as indicated by archaeological evidence <br /> (Moratto, 1984;Johnson, 1991),burials are probably present at the other two. The uncovering of any <br /> ' burials automatically triggers the implementation of CEQA and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, <br /> which generally prohibits the disturbance or removal of human remains from any location other than a <br /> dedicated cemetery. <br /> Significant Impacts <br /> Two types of impacts,direct and indirect,would result from the proposed Buckeye Ranch residential and <br /> recreational development. Direct impacts include actions associated with earthmoving and related <br /> activities associated with the proposed development that would adversely affect significant cultural <br /> resources. Direct impacts would occur to all resources within the project area dependent upon specific <br /> development plans. Indirect impacts are those associated with increased access to an area where cultural <br /> ` resources exist, including the staging of equipment. <br /> Historic features have not been determined to be either architecturally nor historically unique or <br /> significant. Impacts to these resources, therefore, are not considered to be significant. <br /> Impact <br /> 4.9-1 Development of the project site would destroy or degrade cultural resources. <br /> Impacts of the proposed development include, but are not limited to, the following: <br /> • destruction of major portions of the area classified as having high archaeological sensitivity as a result <br /> of landform alteration and construction; <br /> • impairment of the setting and physical linkage or connectivity of the various locales of the complex <br /> through physical separation of the sites by the road, buildings, golf course, and equestrian trail; <br /> i <br /> • loss of future research potential of the complex as an intact cultural focus. <br /> The intrusion of the houses, roads, golf course fairways, country club, equestrian center and horse trail <br /> would significantly alter this river and lake environment. These developments would degrade the area's <br /> ability to serve as a natural setting where the complex can be viewed as a prime example of prehistoric <br /> habitation. <br /> Landform alteration for the construction of roadways, houses and buildings, the golf course, bridge <br /> crossing, and equestrian trail would disturb and destroy large portions of at least three of the four newly <br /> 4.9-9 <br />