Laserfiche WebLink
6.0 ALTERNATIVES <br /> Conversely, retaining Tracy Lakes as seasonal wetlands would place a greater demand on groundwater <br /> supplies and Mokelumne River water for irrigation purposes during the summer months when water <br /> levels are low. <br /> Land Use/Planning Policy <br /> Elimination of the haul route would eliminate the proposed bridge over the Mokelumne River. Permits <br /> from the State Lands Commission, Corps of Engineers and Department of Fish and Game would not be <br /> required for this aspect of the project. <br /> Traffic/Circulation <br /> If the Tracy Lakes are not excavated and subsequently the haul route from the project site is eliminated, <br /> truck trips associated with the excavation would not be generated. This would eliminate hauling-related <br /> truck trips on Davis Road, Peltier Road, Ray Road and Kile Road. Without the truck trips, it would not <br /> be necessary to improve the turning circumferences at street corners or intersections and no re-paving <br /> of the roads along the original haul route would be necessary. Elimination of the haul route would negate <br /> all of the truck-related impacts associated with the proposed project,which would be a beneficial impact. <br /> Under this alternative,the bridge crossing over the Mokelumne River would not be constructed and there <br /> would be no access to Davis Road. This would divert all of the resident vehicle trips to Forest Lake <br /> Road. Because the total number of peak hour trips generated by the proposed project would be low (26 <br /> PM peak-hour trips), they would not significantly impact the traffic circulation on Forest Lake Road. <br /> Public access to the golf course for occasional golf tournaments would predominantly occur via Forest <br /> Lake Road even with the Davis Road extension, thus there would be no significant change in the <br /> tournament-related trips from the proposed project. <br /> Geology <br /> Eliminating the haul route and reducing the scope of the lake enlargement would minimally affect <br /> wastewater disposal concerns by leaving potentially more suitable area available for leachfield systems. <br /> Under this alternative soil erosion, dust generation and soil compaction concerns would be greatly <br /> reduced by elimination of a substantial amount of the earthwork and equipment operation called for by <br /> the proposed project. <br /> Noise <br /> Under this alternative,the only noise impacts generated by the project relate to construction and grading <br /> activities associated with development of the homesites, golf course and associated building,and vehicle <br /> trips. <br /> 6-5 <br />