Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 0 <br />b <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ <br />Test Method Developed By: <br />❑ Sump Manufacturer <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br />Test Method Uses: <br />❑ Pressure <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />❑ Vacuum 9 Hydrostatic <br />Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Sump Testing System <br />I Equipment Resolution; 0.002 <br />Fill Sump N I Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Fill Sump N <br />Sump Diameter: <br />36" <br />Sump Depth: <br />45" <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration <br />16" <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />17" <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: <br />GOOD <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />26" <br />Sump Material: <br />Fiberglass <br />Wait time between, <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />30 NUN. <br />Test Start Time: <br />9:15 A.M. <br />Initial Reading (jtj): <br />7.1493 IN. <br />Test End Time: <br />9:30 A.M. <br />Final Reading (Rf): <br />7.1491 IN. <br />Test Duration: <br />2x15 min. <br />Change in Reading (Rf-R& <br />-0.0003 IN. <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />+/-0.002 in. <br />Test Result: <br />PASS <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />YES <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? <br />YES <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />YES <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? YES <br />Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />Revision: <br />