Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 page 6 of 7 <br />8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps A <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested 0 <br />Test Method Developed By: Q Sump Manufacturer 0 Industry Standard [3Professional Engineer <br />8 Other (Sped) <br />Test Method Uses: ®Pressure 0 Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic <br />Other (Specify) <br />Test Equipment Used:1NCON TS -STS Equipment Resolution: 0.001" <br />Fm Sum # FlIlSunip m sm# FM Sump # Fut Sumv # <br />Sump Diameter: <br />46" <br />Sump Depth: <br />74" <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />31" <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />29„ <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: <br />Clean <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />35" <br />Sump Material: <br />Fiberglass <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />30 min <br />Test Start Time: <br />9:25 AM/ 9:42 AM <br />Initial Reade <br />5.9164"/ 5.9119" <br />Test End Time: <br />9:40 AM/ 9:57 AM <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />5.9156" / 5.9107' <br />Test Duration: <br />2 X 15 Min <br />Chane in Ruin R <br />-.0012 <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />0.001 " <br />.5.w ? ♦'(`.4+a4�Y <br />Yes <br />7 x <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? <br />Yes <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />Yes <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? <br />Yes <br />Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />Revision: <br />