My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
2512
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232418
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2023 2:12:54 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:55:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2009-2010
RECORD_ID
PR0232418
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0004064
FACILITY_NAME
WATERLOO LIQUOR
STREET_NUMBER
2512
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14128102
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2512 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0232418_2512 E WATERLOO_2009-2010.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
313
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed- <br /> Complete <br /> nstalled:Com tete the following checklist: <br /> ® Yes ❑ No's Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> 0 Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a rermte monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modern) <br /> C9 N/A operational? <br /> ® <br /> yes <br /> ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ® N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) 8 Sump/Trench Sensors; 0 Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ®Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the ruonitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no <br /> ® N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90% <br /> C@ Yes* ❑ No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Yes ❑ I`1o* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ® Xes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> *.In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Commeatc REPLACE OLD TANK MONITOR WITH INCON TS-550,TEST SENSORS,FAIL SAFE,POSTIVE <br /> SHUT OFF. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.