Laserfiche WebLink
JUN -04-2008 14:50 Service Station Systems 408 938 8888 P.18/19 <br />0 0 <br />5. FILL RISFR CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps p <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested p <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard p Professional Engineer <br />0 Other (Specify) <br />Test Method Used: p Pressure p Vacuum ® Hydrostatic <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Test Equipment Used: Incon Sump Tester Equipment Resolution: +1- 0.002" <br />Fill Sump # ASL <br />Sum Diameter: 42" <br />Sump the 82" <br />height from Tank Top to Top of N/A <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest 20" <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />Condition of sump prior to Good <br />testiri : <br />Portion of SuR Tested 2" above pIP12A <br />juing Material: Fiberglass <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressurelvacuum/water and 30 minutes <br />starting test <br />Test Start Time: 10:13 am <br />Initial Reading (RI): 3.8924 <br />Test End Time: 10:28 am <br />Final Reading (RF): 3.8931 <br />Test Duration: 1s min. <br />Change in Readin (RF-RO: +0,0007 <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.002" <br />Test Result: ® Pass Fail <br />Is there a sensor in the sum ? ® Yes 0 No <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is ® Yes Cl No ® NA <br />detected? <br />Was sensor removed for testin ?® Yes p No p NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? � Yes p No p NA <br />Comments M (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />"Sensor functionality was not confirmed. This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scope of work". <br />Retest only <br />