Laserfiche WebLink
KLEINFELDER <br /> The regulatory ryagencies were generally receptive to the proposed approach to closure and made <br /> the following comments and suggestions: <br /> 1. Visual characterization of the waste on the Martin Metal property will be sufficient to <br /> show that it is similar in character to the waste on the adjacent Cove Contractors property. <br /> Chemical characterization of the waste will not be necessary. <br /> 2. A deed restriction will have to be placed on the property informing future landowners of <br /> buried waste on the property. <br /> 3. The CVRWQCB will issue Waste Discharge Requirements for postclosure monitoring <br /> activities. <br /> 4. The CVRWQCB will want at least one downgradient monitoring well for the disposal <br /> area. <br /> 5. The SJCEH said that a Solid Waste Facilities Permit will not be required. <br /> 6. The SJCEH said that they have concerns about the presence of landfill gas at the Martin <br /> Metal disposal area. <br /> 1 7. The CVRWQCB suggested that Martin Metal may wish to sample the groundwater <br /> monitoring wells on their property since it has been several years since they were last <br /> sampled. <br /> This workplan has been prepared in accordance with the approach to closure and regulatory <br /> comments made during the March 15, 1996 meeting. <br /> 23-4824150-A00/CR96S052 Page 2 of 7 June 7, 1996 <br /> Copyright 1996 Kleinfelder,Inc. <br />