COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUL 19 Ed Padilla ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Page 2 of 6 PERMIT/SERVICES - Findings, Item 1-G. Please note, before any of these changes can be implemented that the permit will need to be modified or revised and appropriate CEQA review conducted. - Findings, Item 2 (d) , (e) , and (g) are not usually listed as conditioning documents. - The Land Use Permits, Conditional Use Permits, the Negative Declaration, etc. , should be included as conditioning documents of the permit. - Findings, Item 3 should be rephrased to state "The following findings and certifications are required pursuant to PRC 50000.5, 44010, and 50000: 11 . - Findings, Item 3 should include a statement that the permit is consistent with the County Solid Waste Management Plan. - Findings, Item 3 (a) should state "County General Plan" instead of "Stockton City General Plan" . - When submitting the proposed permit, Findings, Item 4, should state the most recent inspection. - Findings, Item 5 should reference the Public Resource Code, Section 44151. - Specifications section should include a permitted daily capacity for receipt of special wastes (dead animals) . Please note, the permitted daily capacity of the special waste should be determined in light of the maximum tonnage allowed for in the April 1990 Negative Declaration. Specification, Item 6. The annual spring clean-up hours of operation should be specified. This should be consistent with the RDSI. Furthermore, the amount of waste received should not exceed the amount found in the CEQA document. The statement in the Closure/Postclosure section is inaccurate and should be replaced with a statement that with submittal of application of a permit review or new permit the owner/operator shall submit, in accordance with 14 CCR 81268 to the LEA, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the CIWMB copies of a plan for the closure of the landfill and a plan for the postclosure maintenance in accordance with 14 CCR 18255.